MSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlueLinx Holdings has a net margin of 5.02% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 0.74%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 16.85% beat BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 8.19%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of $85.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.39%. On the other hand BlueLinx Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $123.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.06%. Given that BlueLinx Holdings has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe BlueLinx Holdings is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 2.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.616%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. BlueLinx Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. BlueLinx Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $928.5M, which are larger than BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues of $710.6M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $46.6M is higher than BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $5.3M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.38x while BlueLinx Holdings's PE ratio is 13.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.14x versus 0.23x for BlueLinx Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Distribution Solutions Group has a net margin of 5.02% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of -5.4%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 16.85% beat Distribution Solutions Group's return on equity of -1.11%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of $85.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.39%. On the other hand Distribution Solutions Group has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.52%. Given that Distribution Solutions Group has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe Distribution Solutions Group is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Distribution Solutions Group has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.442%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Distribution Solutions Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Distribution Solutions Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $928.5M, which are larger than Distribution Solutions Group quarterly revenues of $480.5M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $46.6M is higher than Distribution Solutions Group's net income of -$25.9M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.38x while Distribution Solutions Group's PE ratio is 1,525.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.14x versus 0.77x for Distribution Solutions Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of 5.02% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 4.54%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 16.85% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 17.93%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of $85.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.39%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $95.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.05%. Given that DXP Enterprises has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe DXP Enterprises is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.657, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.727%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $928.5M, which are larger than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $470.9M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $46.6M is higher than DXP Enterprises's net income of $21.4M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.38x while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 20.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.14x versus 0.79x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resideo Technologies has a net margin of 5.02% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 1.24%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 16.85% beat Resideo Technologies's return on equity of 3.75%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of $85.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.39%. On the other hand Resideo Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $28.33 which suggests that it could grow by 62.46%. Given that Resideo Technologies has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe Resideo Technologies is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resideo Technologies has a beta of 2.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.077%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Resideo Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Resideo Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $928.5M, which are smaller than Resideo Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.9B. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $46.6M is higher than Resideo Technologies's net income of $23M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.38x while Resideo Technologies's PE ratio is 27.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.14x versus 0.38x for Resideo Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.