MSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlueLinx Holdings has a net margin of 7.32% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 2.14%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 20.14% beat BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 4.61%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.07%. On the other hand BlueLinx Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.18%. Given that BlueLinx Holdings has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe BlueLinx Holdings is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.75% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 2.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.371%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. BlueLinx Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. BlueLinx Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $979.4M, which are larger than BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues of $747.3M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $71.7M is higher than BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $16M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.57x while BlueLinx Holdings's PE ratio is 29.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.12x versus 0.31x for BlueLinx Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Distribution Solutions Group has a net margin of 7.32% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 4.68%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 20.14% beat Distribution Solutions Group's return on equity of 0.34%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.07%. On the other hand Distribution Solutions Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.21%. Given that Distribution Solutions Group has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe Distribution Solutions Group is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.75% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Distribution Solutions Group has a beta of 0.941, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.904%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. Distribution Solutions Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Distribution Solutions Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $979.4M, which are larger than Distribution Solutions Group quarterly revenues of $468M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $71.7M is higher than Distribution Solutions Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.57x while Distribution Solutions Group's PE ratio is 1,788.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.12x versus 0.98x for Distribution Solutions Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of 7.32% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 4.46%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 20.14% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 17.08%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.07%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -6.12%. Given that MSC Industrial Direct has higher upside potential than DXP Enterprises, analysts believe MSC Industrial Direct is more attractive than DXP Enterprises.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.75% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.705, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.494%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $979.4M, which are larger than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $472.9M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $71.7M is higher than DXP Enterprises's net income of $21.1M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.57x while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 20.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.12x versus 0.77x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resideo Technologies has a net margin of 7.32% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 1.09%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 20.14% beat Resideo Technologies's return on equity of 5.91%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.07%. On the other hand Resideo Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $25.33 which suggests that it could grow by 17.08%. Given that Resideo Technologies has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe Resideo Technologies is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.75% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resideo Technologies has a beta of 2.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.722%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. Resideo Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Resideo Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $979.4M, which are smaller than Resideo Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.8B. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $71.7M is higher than Resideo Technologies's net income of $20M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.57x while Resideo Technologies's PE ratio is 21.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.12x versus 0.56x for Resideo Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.