EXPD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Forward Air has a net margin of 7.65% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of -11.19%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 31.54% beat Forward Air's return on equity of -98.01%.

Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus price target of $116.47, signalling upside risk potential of 4.75%. On the other hand Forward Air has an analysts' consensus of $35.49 which suggests that it could grow by 24.95%. Given that Forward Air has higher upside potential than Expeditors International of Washington, analysts believe Forward Air is more attractive than Expeditors International of Washington.

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 0.975, which suggesting that the stock is 2.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.748%.

Expeditors International of Washington has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Forward Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Expeditors International of Washington pays 26.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air pays out 14.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Expeditors International of Washington quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Forward Air quarterly revenues of $655.9M. Expeditors International of Washington's net income of $229.6M is higher than Forward Air's net income of -$73.4M. Notably, Expeditors International of Washington's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.67x while Forward Air's PE ratio is 10.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expeditors International of Washington is 1.60x versus 0.35x for Forward Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group has a net margin of 7.65% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of 2.39%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 31.54% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.65%.

Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus price target of $116.47, signalling upside risk potential of 4.75%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $48.13 which suggests that it could grow by 9.49%. Given that Hub Group has higher upside potential than Expeditors International of Washington, analysts believe Hub Group is more attractive than Expeditors International of Washington.

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 0.975, which suggesting that the stock is 2.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.408%.

Expeditors International of Washington has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Expeditors International of Washington pays 26.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Expeditors International of Washington quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $986.9M. Expeditors International of Washington's net income of $229.6M is higher than Hub Group's net income of $23.6M. Notably, Expeditors International of Washington's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.67x while Hub Group's PE ratio is 24.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expeditors International of Washington is 1.60x versus 0.68x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of 7.65% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of 1.66%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 31.54% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 4.05%.

Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus price target of $116.47, signalling upside risk potential of 4.75%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.28%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than Expeditors International of Washington, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than Expeditors International of Washington.

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 0.975, which suggesting that the stock is 2.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.776%.

Expeditors International of Washington has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Expeditors International of Washington pays 26.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Expeditors International of Washington quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $203.6M. Expeditors International of Washington's net income of $229.6M is higher than Radiant Logistics's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Expeditors International of Washington's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.67x while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 38.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expeditors International of Washington is 1.60x versus 0.40x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RXO has a net margin of 7.65% compared to Expeditors International of Washington's net margin of -23.37%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 31.54% beat RXO's return on equity of -32.9%.

Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus price target of $116.47, signalling upside risk potential of 4.75%. On the other hand RXO has an analysts' consensus of $27.38 which suggests that it could grow by 14.21%. Given that RXO has higher upside potential than Expeditors International of Washington, analysts believe RXO is more attractive than Expeditors International of Washington.

Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 0.975, which suggesting that the stock is 2.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RXO has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Expeditors International of Washington has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. RXO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Expeditors International of Washington pays 26.83% of its earnings as a dividend. RXO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Expeditors International of Washington quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than RXO quarterly revenues of $1B. Expeditors International of Washington's net income of $229.6M is higher than RXO's net income of -$243M. Notably, Expeditors International of Washington's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.67x while RXO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expeditors International of Washington is 1.60x versus 0.76x for RXO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.