CHRW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hub Group has a net margin of 3.57% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 2.5%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 30.16% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.33%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $112.17, signalling upside risk potential of 24.98%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $42.33 which suggests that it could grow by 31.67%. Given that Hub Group has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Hub Group is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.428%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $973.5M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $149.3M is higher than Hub Group's net income of $24.4M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.31x while Hub Group's PE ratio is 18.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.61x versus 0.50x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pitney Bowes has a net margin of 3.57% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of -7.24%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 30.16% beat Pitney Bowes's return on equity of --.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $112.17, signalling upside risk potential of 24.98%. On the other hand Pitney Bowes has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 100.71%. Given that Pitney Bowes has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Pitney Bowes is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.892, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.209%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Pitney Bowes offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out -17.66% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Pitney Bowes quarterly revenues of $516.1M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $149.3M is higher than Pitney Bowes's net income of -$37.4M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.31x while Pitney Bowes's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.61x versus 0.58x for Pitney Bowes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of 3.57% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 2.45%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 30.16% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 6.63%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $112.17, signalling upside risk potential of 24.98%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 59.66%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.749%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $264.5M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $149.3M is higher than Radiant Logistics's net income of $6.5M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.31x while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 21.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.61x versus 0.33x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Singularity Future Technology has a net margin of 3.57% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of -69.07%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 30.16% beat Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -26.26%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $112.17, signalling upside risk potential of 24.98%. On the other hand Singularity Future Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1132.39%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.776, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.609%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Singularity Future Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Singularity Future Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues of $474.6K. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $149.3M is higher than Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$327.8K. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.31x while Singularity Future Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.61x versus 1.06x for Singularity Future Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.