EA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Golden Matrix Group has a net margin of 14.52% compared to Electronic Arts's net margin of -8.31%. Electronic Arts's return on equity of 13.97% beat Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -4.41%.

Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $162.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.82%. On the other hand Golden Matrix Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 102.02%. Given that Golden Matrix Group has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe Golden Matrix Group is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.805, which suggesting that the stock is 19.512% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.942, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.197%.

Electronic Arts has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Golden Matrix Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Electronic Arts pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Matrix Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Electronic Arts quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues of $41M. Electronic Arts's net income of $294M is higher than Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Electronic Arts's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.61x while Golden Matrix Group's PE ratio is 816.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Electronic Arts is 5.32x versus 1.55x for Golden Matrix Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Roblox has a net margin of 14.52% compared to Electronic Arts's net margin of -26.04%. Electronic Arts's return on equity of 13.97% beat Roblox's return on equity of -960.86%.

Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $162.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.82%. On the other hand Roblox has an analysts' consensus of $50.09 which suggests that it could fall by -3.17%. Given that Electronic Arts has higher upside potential than Roblox, analysts believe Electronic Arts is more attractive than Roblox.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.805, which suggesting that the stock is 19.512% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roblox has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Electronic Arts has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Roblox offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Electronic Arts pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Roblox pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Electronic Arts quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Roblox quarterly revenues of $919M. Electronic Arts's net income of $294M is higher than Roblox's net income of -$239.3M. Notably, Electronic Arts's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.61x while Roblox's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Electronic Arts is 5.32x versus 10.99x for Roblox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skillz has a net margin of 14.52% compared to Electronic Arts's net margin of -85.96%. Electronic Arts's return on equity of 13.97% beat Skillz's return on equity of -17.96%.

Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $162.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.82%. On the other hand Skillz has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 75.61%. Given that Skillz has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe Skillz is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.805, which suggesting that the stock is 19.512% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skillz has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Electronic Arts has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Skillz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Electronic Arts pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Skillz pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Electronic Arts quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Skillz quarterly revenues of $24.6M. Electronic Arts's net income of $294M is higher than Skillz's net income of -$21.1M. Notably, Electronic Arts's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.61x while Skillz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Electronic Arts is 5.32x versus 0.88x for Skillz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Take-Two Interactive Software has a net margin of 14.52% compared to Electronic Arts's net margin of -27.01%. Electronic Arts's return on equity of 13.97% beat Take-Two Interactive Software's return on equity of -52.65%.

Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $162.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.82%. On the other hand Take-Two Interactive Software has an analysts' consensus of $196.07 which suggests that it could grow by 6.51%. Given that Electronic Arts has higher upside potential than Take-Two Interactive Software, analysts believe Electronic Arts is more attractive than Take-Two Interactive Software.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.805, which suggesting that the stock is 19.512% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Take-Two Interactive Software has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.25%.

Electronic Arts has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Take-Two Interactive Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Electronic Arts pays 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Take-Two Interactive Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Electronic Arts quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Take-Two Interactive Software quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Electronic Arts's net income of $294M is higher than Take-Two Interactive Software's net income of -$365.5M. Notably, Electronic Arts's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.61x while Take-Two Interactive Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Electronic Arts is 5.32x versus 5.81x for Take-Two Interactive Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.