LQMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Paul Mueller has a net margin of -384.5% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -5.03% beat Paul Mueller's return on equity of --.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1824%. On the other hand Paul Mueller has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Paul Mueller.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paul Mueller has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.704%.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paul Mueller offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $129K, which are larger than Paul Mueller quarterly revenues of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$496K is higher than Paul Mueller's net income of --. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 103,950.00x while Paul Mueller's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 110.87x versus -- for Paul Mueller. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Productivity Technologies has a net margin of -384.5% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -5.03% beat Productivity Technologies's return on equity of --.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1824%. On the other hand Productivity Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Productivity Technologies, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Productivity Technologies.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Productivity Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Productivity Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Productivity Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $129K, which are larger than Productivity Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$496K is higher than Productivity Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 103,950.00x while Productivity Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 110.87x versus -- for Productivity Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of -384.5% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of -0.33%. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -5.03% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.43%.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1824%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $44.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.76%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Proto Labs.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.658%.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $129K, which are smaller than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $121.8M. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$496K is lower than Proto Labs's net income of -$404K. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 103,950.00x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 56.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 110.87x versus 1.86x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International has a net margin of -384.5% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -5.03% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1824%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5900%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Liquidmetal Technologies, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Liquidmetal Technologies.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.658, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.164%.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $129K, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$496K is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 103,950.00x while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 110.87x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.