Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Sell
27
LQMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.04
Seasonality move
:
6.94%
Day range:
$0.04 - $0.05
52-week range:
$0.04 - $0.08
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
39.19x
P/B ratio:
1.33x
Volume:
160.8K
Avg. volume:
614.2K
1-year change:
-28.48%
Market cap:
$39.9M
Revenue:
$510K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQMT
Liquidmetal Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KMT
Kennametal
|
$484.9M | $0.26 | -1.1% | -10.93% | $27.38 |
|
MUEL
Paul Mueller
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PRAC
Productivity Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PRLB
Proto Labs
|
$121.4M | $0.32 | -3.94% | 18.52% | -- |
|
RMTO
RM2 International
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQMT
Liquidmetal Technologies
|
$0.04 | -- | $39.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 39.19x |
|
KMT
Kennametal
|
$24.54 | $27.38 | $1.9B | 19.17x | $0.20 | 3.26% | 0.96x |
|
MUEL
Paul Mueller
|
$216.00 | -- | $261M | -- | $0.23 | 0.39% | -- |
|
PRAC
Productivity Technologies
|
$0.0200 | -- | $55K | -- | $0.28 | 0% | -- |
|
PRLB
Proto Labs
|
$40.03 | -- | $981.1M | 42.59x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.03x |
|
RMTO
RM2 International
|
$0.05 | -- | $1.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQMT
Liquidmetal Technologies
|
-- | 1.403 | -- | 12.96x |
|
KMT
Kennametal
|
31.88% | 1.467 | 29.07% | 1.01x |
|
MUEL
Paul Mueller
|
-- | -0.781 | -- | -- |
|
PRAC
Productivity Technologies
|
-- | 42.741 | -- | -- |
|
PRLB
Proto Labs
|
-- | 3.405 | -- | 3.17x |
|
RMTO
RM2 International
|
-- | -0.905 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQMT
Liquidmetal Technologies
|
$77K | -$832K | -4.28% | -4.28% | -263.29% | $8K |
|
KMT
Kennametal
|
$151M | $36.6M | 5.29% | 7.75% | 7.82% | $21M |
|
MUEL
Paul Mueller
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PRAC
Productivity Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PRLB
Proto Labs
|
$57.2M | $8.6M | 3.49% | 3.49% | 6.83% | $23.2M |
|
RMTO
RM2 International
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Liquidmetal Technologies vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LQMT or KMT?
Kennametal has a net margin of -139.24% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of 4.59%. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -4.28% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 7.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies24.37% -$0.00 $29.8M KMTKennametal31.33% $0.28 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About LQMT or KMT?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4502.99%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $27.38 which suggests that it could grow by 11.55%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Kennametal.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies0 0 0 KMTKennametal0 5 1 -
Is LQMT or KMT More Risky?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.651, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.119%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQMT or KMT?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQMT or KMT?
Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $316K, which are smaller than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $481.9M. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$440K is lower than Kennametal's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kennametal's PE ratio is 19.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 39.19x versus 0.96x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies39.19x -- $316K -$440K KMTKennametal0.96x 19.17x $481.9M $22.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns LQMT or MUEL?
Paul Mueller has a net margin of -139.24% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -4.28% beat Paul Mueller's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies24.37% -$0.00 $29.8M MUELPaul Mueller-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LQMT or MUEL?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4502.99%. On the other hand Paul Mueller has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Paul Mueller.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies0 0 0 MUELPaul Mueller0 0 0 -
Is LQMT or MUEL More Risky?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paul Mueller has a beta of 0.515, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.534%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQMT or MUEL?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paul Mueller offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQMT or MUEL?
Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $316K, which are larger than Paul Mueller quarterly revenues of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$440K is higher than Paul Mueller's net income of --. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paul Mueller's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 39.19x versus -- for Paul Mueller. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies39.19x -- $316K -$440K MUELPaul Mueller-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LQMT or PRAC?
Productivity Technologies has a net margin of -139.24% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -4.28% beat Productivity Technologies's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies24.37% -$0.00 $29.8M PRACProductivity Technologies-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LQMT or PRAC?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4502.99%. On the other hand Productivity Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Productivity Technologies, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Productivity Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies0 0 0 PRACProductivity Technologies0 0 0 -
Is LQMT or PRAC More Risky?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Productivity Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQMT or PRAC?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Productivity Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Productivity Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQMT or PRAC?
Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $316K, which are larger than Productivity Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$440K is higher than Productivity Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Productivity Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 39.19x versus -- for Productivity Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies39.19x -- $316K -$440K PRACProductivity Technologies-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LQMT or PRLB?
Proto Labs has a net margin of -139.24% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of 5.72%. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -4.28% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 3.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies24.37% -$0.00 $29.8M PRLBProto Labs45.56% $0.29 $680M -
What do Analysts Say About LQMT or PRLB?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4502.99%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.24%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Proto Labs.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies0 0 0 PRLBProto Labs0 0 0 -
Is LQMT or PRLB More Risky?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.953%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQMT or PRLB?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQMT or PRLB?
Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $316K, which are smaller than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $125.6M. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$440K is lower than Proto Labs's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 42.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 39.19x versus 2.03x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies39.19x -- $316K -$440K PRLBProto Labs2.03x 42.59x $125.6M $7.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns LQMT or RMTO?
RM2 International has a net margin of -139.24% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -4.28% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies24.37% -$0.00 $29.8M RMTORM2 International-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LQMT or RMTO?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4502.99%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5404.59%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Liquidmetal Technologies, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Liquidmetal Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies0 0 0 RMTORM2 International0 0 0 -
Is LQMT or RMTO More Risky?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.558, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.208%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQMT or RMTO?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQMT or RMTO?
Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $316K, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$440K is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 39.19x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies39.19x -- $316K -$440K RMTORM2 International0.02x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is down 10.31% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 1.78% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 1.09% over the past day.
