KMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Paul Mueller has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Kennametal's net margin of --. Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4% beat Paul Mueller's return on equity of --.

Kennametal has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.36%. On the other hand Paul Mueller has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kennametal has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller, analysts believe Kennametal is more attractive than Paul Mueller.

Kennametal has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paul Mueller has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.704%.

Kennametal has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Paul Mueller offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Kennametal pays 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kennametal quarterly revenues are $482.1M, which are larger than Paul Mueller quarterly revenues of --. Kennametal's net income of $17.9M is higher than Paul Mueller's net income of --. Notably, Kennametal's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.42x while Paul Mueller's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennametal is 0.88x versus -- for Paul Mueller. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Productivity Technologies has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Kennametal's net margin of --. Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4% beat Productivity Technologies's return on equity of --.

Kennametal has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.36%. On the other hand Productivity Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kennametal has higher upside potential than Productivity Technologies, analysts believe Kennametal is more attractive than Productivity Technologies.

Kennametal has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Productivity Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kennametal has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Productivity Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Kennametal pays 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Productivity Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kennametal quarterly revenues are $482.1M, which are larger than Productivity Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Kennametal's net income of $17.9M is higher than Productivity Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Kennametal's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.42x while Productivity Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennametal is 0.88x versus -- for Productivity Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Kennametal's net margin of -0.33%. Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.43%.

Kennametal has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.36%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $44.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.76%. Given that Proto Labs has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Proto Labs is more attractive than Kennametal.

Kennametal has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.658%.

Kennametal has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennametal pays 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kennametal quarterly revenues are $482.1M, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $121.8M. Kennametal's net income of $17.9M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of -$404K. Notably, Kennametal's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.42x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 56.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennametal is 0.88x versus 1.86x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Kennametal's net margin of --. Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.

Kennametal has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.36%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5900%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Kennametal.

Kennametal has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.658, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.164%.

Kennametal has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennametal pays 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kennametal quarterly revenues are $482.1M, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. Kennametal's net income of $17.9M is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, Kennametal's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.42x while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennametal is 0.88x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.