KWHIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kyocera has a net margin of 3.46% compared to Kawasaki Heavy Industries's net margin of 7.38%. Kawasaki Heavy Industries's return on equity of 4.04% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 3.11%.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.22%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Kawasaki Heavy Industries, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Kawasaki Heavy Industries.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.279, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.095%.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Kyocera offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Kawasaki Heavy Industries pays 52.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Kawasaki Heavy Industries's net income of $98.6M is lower than Kyocera's net income of $236M. Notably, Kawasaki Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.41x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 20.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kawasaki Heavy Industries is 0.58x versus 1.01x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a net margin of 3.46% compared to Kawasaki Heavy Industries's net margin of 5.6%. Kawasaki Heavy Industries's return on equity of 4.04% beat Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's return on equity of 10.84%.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kawasaki Heavy Industries has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, analysts believe Kawasaki Heavy Industries is more attractive than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Kawasaki Heavy Industries pays 52.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries pays out 22.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Kawasaki Heavy Industries's net income of $98.6M is lower than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net income of $399.6M. Notably, Kawasaki Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.41x while Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's PE ratio is 30.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kawasaki Heavy Industries is 0.58x versus 1.48x for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi Electric has a net margin of 3.46% compared to Kawasaki Heavy Industries's net margin of 3.82%. Kawasaki Heavy Industries's return on equity of 4.04% beat Mitsubishi Electric's return on equity of 7.57%.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kawasaki Heavy Industries has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Electric, analysts believe Kawasaki Heavy Industries is more attractive than Mitsubishi Electric.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi Electric has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.389%.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Mitsubishi Electric offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Kawasaki Heavy Industries pays 52.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Electric pays out 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi Electric quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Kawasaki Heavy Industries's net income of $98.6M is lower than Mitsubishi Electric's net income of $315.2M. Notably, Kawasaki Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.41x while Mitsubishi Electric's PE ratio is 19.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kawasaki Heavy Industries is 0.58x versus 0.99x for Mitsubishi Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 3.46% compared to Kawasaki Heavy Industries's net margin of 5.34%. Kawasaki Heavy Industries's return on equity of 4.04% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 104.84%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Kawasaki Heavy Industries, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than Kawasaki Heavy Industries.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.517% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kawasaki Heavy Industries pays 52.86% of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kawasaki Heavy Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Kawasaki Heavy Industries's net income of $98.6M is higher than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Kawasaki Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.41x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 12.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kawasaki Heavy Industries is 0.58x versus 2.47x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.