KYOCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Japan Food Tech Holdings has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Kyocera's net margin of -1471.96%. Kyocera's return on equity of 3.11% beat Japan Food Tech Holdings's return on equity of -241.02%.

Kyocera has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.22%. On the other hand Japan Food Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Japan Food Tech Holdings, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Japan Food Tech Holdings.

Kyocera has a beta of 0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 72.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Food Tech Holdings has a beta of 44.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4354.363%.

Kyocera has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Japan Food Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyocera pays 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Food Tech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kyocera quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Japan Food Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5K. Kyocera's net income of $236M is higher than Japan Food Tech Holdings's net income of -$81.3K. Notably, Kyocera's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.53x while Japan Food Tech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyocera is 1.01x versus 22.60x for Japan Food Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kubota has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Kyocera's net margin of 6.75%. Kyocera's return on equity of 3.11% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.86%.

Kyocera has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.22%. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.38%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Kyocera, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Kyocera.

Kyocera has a beta of 0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 72.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.058%.

Kyocera has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Kubota offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Kyocera pays 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 22.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kyocera quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Kyocera's net income of $236M is lower than Kubota's net income of $317.2M. Notably, Kyocera's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.53x while Kubota's PE ratio is 8.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyocera is 1.01x versus 0.67x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Kyocera's net margin of 5.34%. Kyocera's return on equity of 3.11% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

Kyocera has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.22%. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 104.84%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Kyocera, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than Kyocera.

Kyocera has a beta of 0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 72.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kyocera has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyocera pays 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kyocera quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Kyocera's net income of $236M is higher than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Kyocera's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.53x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 12.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyocera is 1.01x versus 2.47x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SECOM has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Kyocera's net margin of 9.1%. Kyocera's return on equity of 3.11% beat SECOM's return on equity of 7.57%.

Kyocera has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.22%. On the other hand SECOM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than SECOM, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than SECOM.

Kyocera has a beta of 0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 72.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SECOM has a beta of 0.406, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.417%.

Kyocera has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. SECOM offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Kyocera pays 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM pays out 39.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kyocera quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than SECOM quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Kyocera's net income of $236M is higher than SECOM's net income of $158.1M. Notably, Kyocera's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.53x while SECOM's PE ratio is 21.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyocera is 1.01x versus 2.73x for SECOM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.