KNOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of -- compared to Kronos Advanced Technologies's net margin of 3.08%. Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of -- beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 5.35%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7935.71%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $35.80 which suggests that it could grow by 48.43%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than CECO Environmental.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of -1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 252.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.919%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $158.6M. Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of -- is lower than CECO Environmental's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Kronos Advanced Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 68.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Advanced Technologies is -- versus 1.57x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson has a net margin of -- compared to Kronos Advanced Technologies's net margin of 11.02%. Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Donaldson's return on equity of 28.11%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7935.71%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $73.83 which suggests that it could grow by 8.12%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than Donaldson.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of -1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 252.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.969%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $870M. Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Donaldson's net income of $95.9M. Notably, Kronos Advanced Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Donaldson's PE ratio is 19.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Advanced Technologies is -- versus 2.30x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of -- compared to Kronos Advanced Technologies's net margin of -35.64%. Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -4.48%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7935.71%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 300.04%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than Fuel Tech, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than Fuel Tech.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of -1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 252.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 324.613%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $5.3M. Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Fuel Tech's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Kronos Advanced Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Advanced Technologies is -- versus 1.22x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Kronos Advanced Technologies's net margin of 6.85%. Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7935.71%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $107.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.57%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of -1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 252.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.159%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $143.7M. Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M. Notably, Kronos Advanced Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 31.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Advanced Technologies is -- versus 1.90x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.