AAON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Donaldson has a net margin of 8.29% compared to AAON's net margin of 11.02%. AAON's return on equity of 21.71% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 28.11%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $109.80, signalling upside risk potential of 38.25%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $73.83 which suggests that it could grow by 8.82%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Donaldson.

AAON has a beta of 0.996, which suggesting that the stock is 0.43800000000001% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.969%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $297.7M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $870M. AAON's net income of $24.7M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $95.9M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.51x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 19.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 5.54x versus 2.28x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 8.29% compared to AAON's net margin of -35.64%. AAON's return on equity of 21.71% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -4.48%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $109.80, signalling upside risk potential of 38.25%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 309.46%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than AAON, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than AAON.

AAON has a beta of 0.996, which suggesting that the stock is 0.43800000000001% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 324.613%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAON's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $297.7M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $5.3M. AAON's net income of $24.7M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.51x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 5.54x versus 1.19x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 8.29% compared to AAON's net margin of 14.7%. AAON's return on equity of 21.71% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 142.28%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $109.80, signalling upside risk potential of 38.25%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $613.89 which suggests that it could grow by 6.07%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Lennox International.

AAON has a beta of 0.996, which suggesting that the stock is 0.43800000000001% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.296%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $297.7M, which are smaller than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.3B. AAON's net income of $24.7M is lower than Lennox International's net income of $197.7M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.51x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 25.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 5.54x versus 3.88x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 8.29% compared to AAON's net margin of 6.85%. AAON's return on equity of 21.71% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $109.80, signalling upside risk potential of 38.25%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $107.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.62%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

AAON has a beta of 0.996, which suggesting that the stock is 0.43800000000001% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.159%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAON's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $297.7M, which are larger than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $143.7M. AAON's net income of $24.7M is higher than Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.51x while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 31.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 5.54x versus 1.90x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.