GCEI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Energy And Water Development has a net margin of -- compared to Global Clean Energy's net margin of --. Global Clean Energy's return on equity of -- beat Energy And Water Development's return on equity of --.

Global Clean Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Energy And Water Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Clean Energy has higher upside potential than Energy And Water Development, analysts believe Global Clean Energy is more attractive than Energy And Water Development.

Global Clean Energy has a beta of 1.065, which suggesting that the stock is 6.536% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy And Water Development has a beta of -399.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40092.612%.

Global Clean Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy And Water Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Clean Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy And Water Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Clean Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Energy And Water Development quarterly revenues of --. Global Clean Energy's net income of -- is lower than Energy And Water Development's net income of -$840.7K. Notably, Global Clean Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Energy And Water Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Clean Energy is -- versus -- for Energy And Water Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LifeQuest World has a net margin of -- compared to Global Clean Energy's net margin of --. Global Clean Energy's return on equity of -- beat LifeQuest World's return on equity of --.

Global Clean Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LifeQuest World has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Clean Energy has higher upside potential than LifeQuest World, analysts believe Global Clean Energy is more attractive than LifeQuest World.

Global Clean Energy has a beta of 1.065, which suggesting that the stock is 6.536% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LifeQuest World has a beta of -0.244, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.362%.

Global Clean Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LifeQuest World offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Clean Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LifeQuest World pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Clean Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LifeQuest World quarterly revenues of --. Global Clean Energy's net income of -- is lower than LifeQuest World's net income of --. Notably, Global Clean Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LifeQuest World's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Clean Energy is -- versus -- for LifeQuest World. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enviri has a net margin of -- compared to Global Clean Energy's net margin of -2.3%. Global Clean Energy's return on equity of -- beat Enviri's return on equity of -17.76%.

Global Clean Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enviri has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 93.32%. Given that Enviri has higher upside potential than Global Clean Energy, analysts believe Enviri is more attractive than Global Clean Energy.

Global Clean Energy has a beta of 1.065, which suggesting that the stock is 6.536% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enviri has a beta of 2.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.349%.

Global Clean Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enviri offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Clean Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enviri pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Clean Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Enviri quarterly revenues of $573.6M. Global Clean Energy's net income of -- is lower than Enviri's net income of -$13.2M. Notably, Global Clean Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enviri's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Clean Energy is -- versus 0.29x for Enviri. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quest Resource Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Global Clean Energy's net margin of -4.65%. Global Clean Energy's return on equity of -- beat Quest Resource Holding's return on equity of -12%.

Global Clean Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quest Resource Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 86.11%. Given that Quest Resource Holding has higher upside potential than Global Clean Energy, analysts believe Quest Resource Holding is more attractive than Global Clean Energy.

Global Clean Energy has a beta of 1.065, which suggesting that the stock is 6.536% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Resource Holding has a beta of 0.620, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.984%.

Global Clean Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quest Resource Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Clean Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Resource Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Clean Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Quest Resource Holding quarterly revenues of $72.8M. Global Clean Energy's net income of -- is lower than Quest Resource Holding's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Global Clean Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quest Resource Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Clean Energy is -- versus 0.43x for Quest Resource Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.