Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Sell
9
ATMU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$39.02
Seasonality move
:
9.73%
Day range:
$38.20 - $39.58
52-week range:
$21.09 - $45.43
Dividend yield:
0.26%
P/E ratio:
18.26x
P/S ratio:
1.97x
P/B ratio:
14.74x
Volume:
972.7K
Avg. volume:
829.7K
1-year change:
61.72%
Market cap:
$3.3B
Revenue:
$1.6B
EPS (TTM):
$2.15
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
$403.4M | $0.52 | -0.15% | 25.03% | $34.83 |
|
DGWR
Deep Green Waste & Recycling
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EAWD
Energy And Water Development
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QRHC
Quest Resource Holding
|
$77.1M | $0.08 | 6.21% | -- | -- |
|
SCPJ
Scope Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
$39.25 | $34.83 | $3.3B | 18.26x | $0.05 | 0.26% | 1.97x |
|
DGWR
Deep Green Waste & Recycling
|
$0.02 | -- | $149.8K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
EAWD
Energy And Water Development
|
$0.0054 | -- | $2.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
$0.0058 | -- | $701.7K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
QRHC
Quest Resource Holding
|
$6.00 | -- | $123.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.43x |
|
SCPJ
Scope Industries
|
$305.00 | -- | $304.6M | -- | $10.00 | 3.28% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
72.94% | 1.278 | 19.05% | 1.23x |
|
DGWR
Deep Green Waste & Recycling
|
-- | 2.091 | -- | -- |
|
EAWD
Energy And Water Development
|
-- | 3.886 | -- | -- |
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
-- | -7.755 | -- | -- |
|
QRHC
Quest Resource Holding
|
53.79% | -1.392 | 44.74% | 1.44x |
|
SCPJ
Scope Industries
|
-- | -0.336 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
$111.3M | $55.1M | 24.82% | 141.7% | 15.88% | $54.3M |
|
DGWR
Deep Green Waste & Recycling
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EAWD
Energy And Water Development
|
-- | -$492.7K | -- | -- | -- | -$177.3K |
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QRHC
Quest Resource Holding
|
$11.7M | -$940.3K | -5.91% | -12% | -1.29% | -$823.7K |
|
SCPJ
Scope Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Atmus Filtration Technologies vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ATMU or DGWR?
Deep Green Waste & Recycling has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies's net margin of --. Atmus Filtration Technologies's return on equity of 141.7% beat Deep Green Waste & Recycling's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies27.57% $0.52 $817.5M DGWRDeep Green Waste & Recycling-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ATMU or DGWR?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 19.38%. On the other hand Deep Green Waste & Recycling has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher upside potential than Deep Green Waste & Recycling, analysts believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more attractive than Deep Green Waste & Recycling.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies4 0 0 DGWRDeep Green Waste & Recycling0 0 0 -
Is ATMU or DGWR More Risky?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deep Green Waste & Recycling has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.503%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATMU or DGWR?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Deep Green Waste & Recycling offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Deep Green Waste & Recycling pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ATMU or DGWR?
Atmus Filtration Technologies quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are larger than Deep Green Waste & Recycling quarterly revenues of --. Atmus Filtration Technologies's net income of $43.8M is higher than Deep Green Waste & Recycling's net income of --. Notably, Atmus Filtration Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.26x while Deep Green Waste & Recycling's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atmus Filtration Technologies is 1.97x versus 0.03x for Deep Green Waste & Recycling. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies1.97x 18.26x $403.7M $43.8M DGWRDeep Green Waste & Recycling0.03x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ATMU or EAWD?
Energy And Water Development has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies's net margin of --. Atmus Filtration Technologies's return on equity of 141.7% beat Energy And Water Development's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies27.57% $0.52 $817.5M EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -$0.01 -- -
What do Analysts Say About ATMU or EAWD?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 19.38%. On the other hand Energy And Water Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher upside potential than Energy And Water Development, analysts believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more attractive than Energy And Water Development.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies4 0 0 EAWDEnergy And Water Development0 0 0 -
Is ATMU or EAWD More Risky?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy And Water Development has a beta of -399.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40092.612%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATMU or EAWD?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Energy And Water Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy And Water Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ATMU or EAWD?
Atmus Filtration Technologies quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are larger than Energy And Water Development quarterly revenues of --. Atmus Filtration Technologies's net income of $43.8M is higher than Energy And Water Development's net income of -$840.7K. Notably, Atmus Filtration Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.26x while Energy And Water Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atmus Filtration Technologies is 1.97x versus -- for Energy And Water Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies1.97x 18.26x $403.7M $43.8M EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -- -- -$840.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns ATMU or LQWC?
LifeQuest World has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies's net margin of --. Atmus Filtration Technologies's return on equity of 141.7% beat LifeQuest World's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies27.57% $0.52 $817.5M LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ATMU or LQWC?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 19.38%. On the other hand LifeQuest World has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher upside potential than LifeQuest World, analysts believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more attractive than LifeQuest World.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies4 0 0 LQWCLifeQuest World0 0 0 -
Is ATMU or LQWC More Risky?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LifeQuest World has a beta of -0.244, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.362%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATMU or LQWC?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. LifeQuest World offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LifeQuest World pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ATMU or LQWC?
Atmus Filtration Technologies quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are larger than LifeQuest World quarterly revenues of --. Atmus Filtration Technologies's net income of $43.8M is higher than LifeQuest World's net income of --. Notably, Atmus Filtration Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.26x while LifeQuest World's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atmus Filtration Technologies is 1.97x versus -- for LifeQuest World. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies1.97x 18.26x $403.7M $43.8M LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ATMU or QRHC?
Quest Resource Holding has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies's net margin of -4.65%. Atmus Filtration Technologies's return on equity of 141.7% beat Quest Resource Holding's return on equity of -12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies27.57% $0.52 $817.5M QRHCQuest Resource Holding16.08% -$0.16 $135.8M -
What do Analysts Say About ATMU or QRHC?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 19.38%. On the other hand Quest Resource Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 86.11%. Given that Quest Resource Holding has higher upside potential than Atmus Filtration Technologies, analysts believe Quest Resource Holding is more attractive than Atmus Filtration Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies4 0 0 QRHCQuest Resource Holding0 0 0 -
Is ATMU or QRHC More Risky?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Resource Holding has a beta of 0.620, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.984%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATMU or QRHC?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Quest Resource Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Resource Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ATMU or QRHC?
Atmus Filtration Technologies quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are larger than Quest Resource Holding quarterly revenues of $72.8M. Atmus Filtration Technologies's net income of $43.8M is higher than Quest Resource Holding's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Atmus Filtration Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.26x while Quest Resource Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atmus Filtration Technologies is 1.97x versus 0.43x for Quest Resource Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies1.97x 18.26x $403.7M $43.8M QRHCQuest Resource Holding0.43x -- $72.8M -$3.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns ATMU or SCPJ?
Scope Industries has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies's net margin of --. Atmus Filtration Technologies's return on equity of 141.7% beat Scope Industries's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies27.57% $0.52 $817.5M SCPJScope Industries-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ATMU or SCPJ?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 19.38%. On the other hand Scope Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher upside potential than Scope Industries, analysts believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more attractive than Scope Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies4 0 0 SCPJScope Industries0 0 0 -
Is ATMU or SCPJ More Risky?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scope Industries has a beta of 0.358, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.176%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATMU or SCPJ?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Scope Industries offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Scope Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ATMU or SCPJ?
Atmus Filtration Technologies quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are larger than Scope Industries quarterly revenues of --. Atmus Filtration Technologies's net income of $43.8M is higher than Scope Industries's net income of --. Notably, Atmus Filtration Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.26x while Scope Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atmus Filtration Technologies is 1.97x versus -- for Scope Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies1.97x 18.26x $403.7M $43.8M SCPJScope Industries-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 3.65% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 4.9% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4.4% over the past day.
