FUJHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mitsubishi Motors has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Subaru's net margin of 4.7%. Subaru's return on equity of 16.45% beat Mitsubishi Motors's return on equity of 13.91%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi Motors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Subaru has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Motors, analysts believe Subaru is more attractive than Mitsubishi Motors.

Subaru has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.647% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi Motors has a beta of 0.298, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.164%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Mitsubishi Motors offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Subaru pays 16.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Motors pays out 9.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than Mitsubishi Motors quarterly revenues of $4B. Subaru's net income of $538.9M is higher than Mitsubishi Motors's net income of $189M. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.87x while Mitsubishi Motors's PE ratio is 5.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.41x versus 0.28x for Mitsubishi Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mazda Motor has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Subaru's net margin of 4.13%. Subaru's return on equity of 16.45% beat Mazda Motor's return on equity of 13.31%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mazda Motor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Subaru has higher upside potential than Mazda Motor, analysts believe Subaru is more attractive than Mazda Motor.

Subaru has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.647% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mazda Motor has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.742%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Mazda Motor offers a yield of 5.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Subaru pays 16.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Mazda Motor pays out 15.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than Mazda Motor quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Subaru's net income of $538.9M is higher than Mazda Motor's net income of $319.5M. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.87x while Mazda Motor's PE ratio is 2.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.41x versus 0.12x for Mazda Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nissan Motor has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Subaru's net margin of 0.95%. Subaru's return on equity of 16.45% beat Nissan Motor's return on equity of 5.65%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nissan Motor has an analysts' consensus of $7.26 which suggests that it could grow by 19.34%. Given that Nissan Motor has higher upside potential than Subaru, analysts believe Nissan Motor is more attractive than Subaru.

Subaru has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.647% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nissan Motor has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.305%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Nissan Motor offers a yield of 4.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Subaru pays 16.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Nissan Motor pays out 13.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than Nissan Motor quarterly revenues of $19.2B. Subaru's net income of $538.9M is higher than Nissan Motor's net income of $183.2M. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.87x while Nissan Motor's PE ratio is 4.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.41x versus 0.13x for Nissan Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Subaru's net margin of 5.01%. Subaru's return on equity of 16.45% beat Toyota Motor's return on equity of 12.15%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.84%. Given that Toyota Motor has higher upside potential than Subaru, analysts believe Toyota Motor is more attractive than Subaru.

Subaru has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.647% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.329%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Toyota Motor offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.60 per share. Subaru pays 16.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor pays out 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than Toyota Motor quarterly revenues of $77B. Subaru's net income of $538.9M is lower than Toyota Motor's net income of $3.9B. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.87x while Toyota Motor's PE ratio is 8.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.41x versus 0.79x for Toyota Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.