EVSV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BrightView Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Enviro Serv's net margin of 3.51%. Enviro Serv's return on equity of -- beat BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 3.79%.

Enviro Serv has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BrightView Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.08%. Given that BrightView Holdings has higher upside potential than Enviro Serv, analysts believe BrightView Holdings is more attractive than Enviro Serv.

Enviro Serv has a beta of 0.682, which suggesting that the stock is 31.76% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.832%.

Enviro Serv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BrightView Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enviro Serv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BrightView Holdings pays out 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. BrightView Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enviro Serv quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues of $728.7M. Enviro Serv's net income of -- is lower than BrightView Holdings's net income of $25.6M. Notably, Enviro Serv's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BrightView Holdings's PE ratio is 149.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enviro Serv is -- versus 0.57x for BrightView Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DevvStream has a net margin of -- compared to Enviro Serv's net margin of --. Enviro Serv's return on equity of -- beat DevvStream's return on equity of --.

Enviro Serv has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DevvStream has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enviro Serv has higher upside potential than DevvStream, analysts believe Enviro Serv is more attractive than DevvStream.

Enviro Serv has a beta of 0.682, which suggesting that the stock is 31.76% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DevvStream has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enviro Serv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DevvStream offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enviro Serv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DevvStream pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enviro Serv quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DevvStream quarterly revenues of --. Enviro Serv's net income of -- is lower than DevvStream's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Enviro Serv's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DevvStream's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enviro Serv is -- versus -- for DevvStream. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GFL Environmental has a net margin of -- compared to Enviro Serv's net margin of 5.48%. Enviro Serv's return on equity of -- beat GFL Environmental's return on equity of -8.01%.

Enviro Serv has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GFL Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $50.14 which suggests that it could grow by 11.81%. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than Enviro Serv, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than Enviro Serv.

Enviro Serv has a beta of 0.682, which suggesting that the stock is 31.76% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enviro Serv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GFL Environmental offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Enviro Serv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out 55.07% of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enviro Serv quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GFL Environmental quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Enviro Serv's net income of -- is lower than GFL Environmental's net income of $80.9M. Notably, Enviro Serv's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GFL Environmental's PE ratio is 1,017.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enviro Serv is -- versus 2.96x for GFL Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quest Water Global has a net margin of -- compared to Enviro Serv's net margin of --. Enviro Serv's return on equity of -- beat Quest Water Global's return on equity of --.

Enviro Serv has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quest Water Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enviro Serv has higher upside potential than Quest Water Global, analysts believe Enviro Serv is more attractive than Quest Water Global.

Enviro Serv has a beta of 0.682, which suggesting that the stock is 31.76% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Water Global has a beta of 0.023, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.738%.

Enviro Serv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quest Water Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enviro Serv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Water Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enviro Serv quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Quest Water Global quarterly revenues of --. Enviro Serv's net income of -- is lower than Quest Water Global's net income of -$137.3K. Notably, Enviro Serv's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quest Water Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enviro Serv is -- versus -- for Quest Water Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.