GFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Excelsior Solutions has a net margin of 5.48% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of --. GFL Environmental's return on equity of -8.01% beat Excelsior Solutions's return on equity of --.

GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $50.14, signalling upside risk potential of 12.14%. On the other hand Excelsior Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than Excelsior Solutions, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than Excelsior Solutions.

GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Excelsior Solutions has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.278%.

GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Excelsior Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GFL Environmental pays 55.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelsior Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Excelsior Solutions quarterly revenues of --. GFL Environmental's net income of $80.9M is higher than Excelsior Solutions's net income of --. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 1,017.40x while Excelsior Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 2.95x versus -- for Excelsior Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DevvStream has a net margin of 5.48% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of --. GFL Environmental's return on equity of -8.01% beat DevvStream's return on equity of --.

GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $50.14, signalling upside risk potential of 12.14%. On the other hand DevvStream has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than DevvStream, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than DevvStream.

GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DevvStream has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. DevvStream offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GFL Environmental pays 55.07% of its earnings as a dividend. DevvStream pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than DevvStream quarterly revenues of --. GFL Environmental's net income of $80.9M is higher than DevvStream's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 1,017.40x while DevvStream's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 2.95x versus -- for DevvStream. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy And Water Development has a net margin of 5.48% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of --. GFL Environmental's return on equity of -8.01% beat Energy And Water Development's return on equity of --.

GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $50.14, signalling upside risk potential of 12.14%. On the other hand Energy And Water Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than Energy And Water Development, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than Energy And Water Development.

GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy And Water Development has a beta of -399.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40092.612%.

GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Energy And Water Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GFL Environmental pays 55.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy And Water Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Energy And Water Development quarterly revenues of --. GFL Environmental's net income of $80.9M is higher than Energy And Water Development's net income of -$840.7K. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 1,017.40x while Energy And Water Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 2.95x versus -- for Energy And Water Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LifeQuest World has a net margin of 5.48% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of --. GFL Environmental's return on equity of -8.01% beat LifeQuest World's return on equity of --.

GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $50.14, signalling upside risk potential of 12.14%. On the other hand LifeQuest World has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than LifeQuest World, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than LifeQuest World.

GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LifeQuest World has a beta of -0.244, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.362%.

GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. LifeQuest World offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GFL Environmental pays 55.07% of its earnings as a dividend. LifeQuest World pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than LifeQuest World quarterly revenues of --. GFL Environmental's net income of $80.9M is higher than LifeQuest World's net income of --. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 1,017.40x while LifeQuest World's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 2.95x versus -- for LifeQuest World. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.