Is VICI Properties Dividend Worth It?
VICI Properties (NYSE:VICI) is a REIT that specializes in hotel…
Buy
64
GFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$45.53
Seasonality move
:
3.35%
Day range:
$45.00 - $47.05
52-week range:
$30.57 - $48.87
Dividend yield:
0.12%
P/E ratio:
977.81x
P/S ratio:
3.10x
P/B ratio:
3.76x
Volume:
2.6M
Avg. volume:
1.9M
1-year change:
30.88%
Market cap:
$18.3B
Revenue:
$5.7B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.55
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFL
GFL Environmental
|
$1.4B | $0.16 | -0.22% | 478.98% | $50.33 |
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
$399.2M | $0.53 | -0.56% | 10.47% | $45.14 |
|
BRYN
Excelsior Solutions
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DEVS
DevvStream
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAIN
Rain Oncology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFL
GFL Environmental
|
$46.50 | $50.33 | $18.3B | 977.81x | $0.01 | 0.12% | 3.10x |
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
$38.09 | $45.14 | $3.2B | 17.24x | $0.05 | 0.26% | 1.91x |
|
BRYN
Excelsior Solutions
|
$0.0032 | -- | $638.5K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DEVS
DevvStream
|
$0.34 | -- | $9.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
$0.0102 | -- | $1.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RAIN
Rain Oncology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFL
GFL Environmental
|
58.9% | 1.320 | 39.4% | 0.44x |
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
72.27% | 2.011 | 18.25% | 1.27x |
|
BRYN
Excelsior Solutions
|
-- | -4.659 | -- | -- |
|
DEVS
DevvStream
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
-- | -6.476 | -- | -- |
|
RAIN
Rain Oncology
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFL
GFL Environmental
|
$270.3M | $74.9M | -4.32% | -9.99% | -8.75% | $180.7M |
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
$107.1M | $47M | 24.31% | 111.92% | 14.78% | $10M |
|
BRYN
Excelsior Solutions
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DEVS
DevvStream
|
-- | -$1.2M | -- | -- | -- | -$363.3K |
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAIN
Rain Oncology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
GFL Environmental vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GFL or ATMU?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of -9.52% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of 9.86%. GFL Environmental's return on equity of -9.99% beat Atmus Filtration Technologies's return on equity of 111.92%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLGFL Environmental19.11% -$0.37 $12B ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies26.33% $0.48 $819.9M -
What do Analysts Say About GFL or ATMU?
GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $50.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.24%. On the other hand Atmus Filtration Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $45.14 which suggests that it could grow by 18.52%. Given that Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher upside potential than GFL Environmental, analysts believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more attractive than GFL Environmental.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLGFL Environmental9 3 1 ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies3 1 0 -
Is GFL or ATMU More Risky?
GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFL or ATMU?
GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Atmus Filtration Technologies offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. GFL Environmental pays -3.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 4.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Atmus Filtration Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFL or ATMU?
GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Atmus Filtration Technologies quarterly revenues of $406.7M. GFL Environmental's net income of -$134.7M is lower than Atmus Filtration Technologies's net income of $40.1M. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 977.81x while Atmus Filtration Technologies's PE ratio is 17.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 3.10x versus 1.91x for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLGFL Environmental3.10x 977.81x $1.4B -$134.7M ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies1.91x 17.24x $406.7M $40.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns GFL or BRYN?
Excelsior Solutions has a net margin of -9.52% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of --. GFL Environmental's return on equity of -9.99% beat Excelsior Solutions's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLGFL Environmental19.11% -$0.37 $12B BRYNExcelsior Solutions-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFL or BRYN?
GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $50.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.24%. On the other hand Excelsior Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than Excelsior Solutions, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than Excelsior Solutions.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLGFL Environmental9 3 1 BRYNExcelsior Solutions0 0 0 -
Is GFL or BRYN More Risky?
GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Excelsior Solutions has a beta of 0.433, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.667%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFL or BRYN?
GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Excelsior Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GFL Environmental pays -3.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelsior Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFL or BRYN?
GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Excelsior Solutions quarterly revenues of --. GFL Environmental's net income of -$134.7M is higher than Excelsior Solutions's net income of --. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 977.81x while Excelsior Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 3.10x versus -- for Excelsior Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLGFL Environmental3.10x 977.81x $1.4B -$134.7M BRYNExcelsior Solutions-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFL or DEVS?
DevvStream has a net margin of -9.52% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of --. GFL Environmental's return on equity of -9.99% beat DevvStream's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLGFL Environmental19.11% -$0.37 $12B DEVSDevvStream-- -$0.04 -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFL or DEVS?
GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $50.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.24%. On the other hand DevvStream has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than DevvStream, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than DevvStream.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLGFL Environmental9 3 1 DEVSDevvStream0 0 0 -
Is GFL or DEVS More Risky?
GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DevvStream has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFL or DEVS?
GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. DevvStream offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GFL Environmental pays -3.9% of its earnings as a dividend. DevvStream pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFL or DEVS?
GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than DevvStream quarterly revenues of --. GFL Environmental's net income of -$134.7M is lower than DevvStream's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 977.81x while DevvStream's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 3.10x versus -- for DevvStream. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLGFL Environmental3.10x 977.81x $1.4B -$134.7M DEVSDevvStream-- -- -- -$1.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns GFL or LQWC?
LifeQuest World has a net margin of -9.52% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of --. GFL Environmental's return on equity of -9.99% beat LifeQuest World's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLGFL Environmental19.11% -$0.37 $12B LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFL or LQWC?
GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $50.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.24%. On the other hand LifeQuest World has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than LifeQuest World, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than LifeQuest World.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLGFL Environmental9 3 1 LQWCLifeQuest World0 0 0 -
Is GFL or LQWC More Risky?
GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LifeQuest World has a beta of -0.338, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.767%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFL or LQWC?
GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. LifeQuest World offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GFL Environmental pays -3.9% of its earnings as a dividend. LifeQuest World pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFL or LQWC?
GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than LifeQuest World quarterly revenues of --. GFL Environmental's net income of -$134.7M is higher than LifeQuest World's net income of --. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 977.81x while LifeQuest World's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 3.10x versus -- for LifeQuest World. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLGFL Environmental3.10x 977.81x $1.4B -$134.7M LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFL or RAIN?
Rain Oncology has a net margin of -9.52% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of --. GFL Environmental's return on equity of -9.99% beat Rain Oncology's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLGFL Environmental19.11% -$0.37 $12B RAINRain Oncology-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFL or RAIN?
GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $50.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.24%. On the other hand Rain Oncology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than Rain Oncology, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than Rain Oncology.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLGFL Environmental9 3 1 RAINRain Oncology0 0 0 -
Is GFL or RAIN More Risky?
GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rain Oncology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFL or RAIN?
GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Rain Oncology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GFL Environmental pays -3.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Rain Oncology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFL or RAIN?
GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Rain Oncology quarterly revenues of --. GFL Environmental's net income of -$134.7M is higher than Rain Oncology's net income of --. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 977.81x while Rain Oncology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 3.10x versus -- for Rain Oncology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLGFL Environmental3.10x 977.81x $1.4B -$134.7M RAINRain Oncology-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is GEO Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
The GEO Group (NYSE:GEO) is a private prison and mental…
Why Did Sunrise Communications Stock Drop?
Sunrise Communications (NASDAQ:SNRE) is a Swiss mobile telephone, TV and…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
83
THLLY alert for Mar 4
Thales [THLLY] is up 2% over the past day.
Buy
89
BAESY alert for Mar 4
BAE Systems PLC [BAESY] is down 2.37% over the past day.
Sell
33
GDS alert for Mar 4
GDS Holdings [GDS] is up 11.41% over the past day.
