CKHUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Euro Tech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to CK Hutchison Holdings's net margin of --. CK Hutchison Holdings's return on equity of 3.39% beat Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of --.

CK Hutchison Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CK Hutchison Holdings has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings, analysts believe CK Hutchison Holdings is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings.

CK Hutchison Holdings has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.697% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.226%.

CK Hutchison Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.54%. Euro Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CK Hutchison Holdings pays 46.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings pays out 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CK Hutchison Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. CK Hutchison Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, CK Hutchison Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.59x while Euro Tech Holdings's PE ratio is 5.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CK Hutchison Holdings is 0.61x versus 0.67x for Euro Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Highway Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to CK Hutchison Holdings's net margin of 10.91%. CK Hutchison Holdings's return on equity of 3.39% beat Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17%.

CK Hutchison Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CK Hutchison Holdings has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings, analysts believe CK Hutchison Holdings is more attractive than Highway Holdings.

CK Hutchison Holdings has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.697% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.035, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.549%.

CK Hutchison Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.54%. Highway Holdings offers a yield of 6.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. CK Hutchison Holdings pays 46.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings pays out -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. CK Hutchison Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CK Hutchison Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1M. CK Hutchison Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings's net income of $231K. Notably, CK Hutchison Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.59x while Highway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CK Hutchison Holdings is 0.61x versus 1.13x for Highway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a net margin of -- compared to CK Hutchison Holdings's net margin of --. CK Hutchison Holdings's return on equity of 3.39% beat Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of --.

CK Hutchison Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CK Hutchison Holdings has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe CK Hutchison Holdings is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.

CK Hutchison Holdings has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.697% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CK Hutchison Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.54%. Intelligent Living Application Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CK Hutchison Holdings pays 46.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CK Hutchison Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CK Hutchison Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues of --. CK Hutchison Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of --. Notably, CK Hutchison Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.59x while Intelligent Living Application Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CK Hutchison Holdings is 0.61x versus 1.78x for Intelligent Living Application Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WANG & LEE Group has a net margin of -- compared to CK Hutchison Holdings's net margin of --. CK Hutchison Holdings's return on equity of 3.39% beat WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of --.

CK Hutchison Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WANG & LEE Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CK Hutchison Holdings has higher upside potential than WANG & LEE Group, analysts believe CK Hutchison Holdings is more attractive than WANG & LEE Group.

CK Hutchison Holdings has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.697% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CK Hutchison Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.54%. WANG & LEE Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CK Hutchison Holdings pays 46.32% of its earnings as a dividend. WANG & LEE Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CK Hutchison Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CK Hutchison Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues of --. CK Hutchison Holdings's net income of -- is lower than WANG & LEE Group's net income of --. Notably, CK Hutchison Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.59x while WANG & LEE Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CK Hutchison Holdings is 0.61x versus -- for WANG & LEE Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.