HIHO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Euro Tech Holdings has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Highway Holdings's net margin of --. Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17% beat Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of --.

Highway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings, analysts believe Highway Holdings is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings.

Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.035, which suggesting that the stock is 96.549% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.226%.

Highway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.19%. Euro Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Highway Holdings pays -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings pays out 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Highway Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are larger than Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings's net income of $231K is higher than Euro Tech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Euro Tech Holdings's PE ratio is 5.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings is 1.13x versus 0.67x for Euro Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Highway Holdings's net margin of --. Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17% beat Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of --.

Highway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe Highway Holdings is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.

Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.035, which suggesting that the stock is 96.549% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Highway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.19%. Intelligent Living Application Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highway Holdings pays -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Highway Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are larger than Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings's net income of $231K is higher than Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intelligent Living Application Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings is 1.13x versus 1.78x for Intelligent Living Application Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Roma Green Finance has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Highway Holdings's net margin of --. Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17% beat Roma Green Finance's return on equity of -31.63%.

Highway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance, analysts believe Highway Holdings is more attractive than Roma Green Finance.

Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.035, which suggesting that the stock is 96.549% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Highway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.19%. Roma Green Finance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highway Holdings pays -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Highway Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are larger than Roma Green Finance quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings's net income of $231K is higher than Roma Green Finance's net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roma Green Finance's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings is 1.13x versus 6.03x for Roma Green Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WANG & LEE Group has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Highway Holdings's net margin of --. Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17% beat WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of --.

Highway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WANG & LEE Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings has higher upside potential than WANG & LEE Group, analysts believe Highway Holdings is more attractive than WANG & LEE Group.

Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.035, which suggesting that the stock is 96.549% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Highway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.19%. WANG & LEE Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highway Holdings pays -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. WANG & LEE Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Highway Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are larger than WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings's net income of $231K is higher than WANG & LEE Group's net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WANG & LEE Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings is 1.13x versus -- for WANG & LEE Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.