TPYP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's net margin of --. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's return on equity of -- beat ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's return on equity of --.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has higher upside potential than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund, analysts believe Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund is more attractive than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.641% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has a beta of 2.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.682%.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund offers a yield of 7.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's net income of -- is lower than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund is -- versus -- for ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global X MLP ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's net margin of --. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's return on equity of -- beat Global X MLP ETF's return on equity of --.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X MLP ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has higher upside potential than Global X MLP ETF, analysts believe Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund is more attractive than Global X MLP ETF.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.641% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X MLP ETF has a beta of 1.400, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.003%.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Global X MLP ETF offers a yield of 7.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X MLP ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X MLP ETF quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's net income of -- is lower than Global X MLP ETF's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X MLP ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund is -- versus -- for Global X MLP ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's net margin of --. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's return on equity of -- beat Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund's return on equity of --.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has higher upside potential than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund, analysts believe Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund is more attractive than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.641% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund has a beta of 1.884, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.4%.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund offers a yield of 7.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's net income of -- is lower than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund is -- versus -- for Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's net margin of --. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's return on equity of -- beat Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's return on equity of --.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has higher upside potential than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure, analysts believe Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund is more attractive than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.641% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 2.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.388%.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure offers a yield of 7.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's net income of -- is lower than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund is -- versus -- for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.