Will Uber Stock Recover?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have had a rough few…
Buy
77
TYG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$43.89
Seasonality move
:
-0.96%
Day range:
$43.73 - $44.55
52-week range:
$28.01 - $46.35
Dividend yield:
7.62%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
122.5K
Avg. volume:
71K
1-year change:
48.73%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NML
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
$43.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 7.62% | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
$47.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 7.04% | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
$13.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 6.16% | -- |
|
NML
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund
|
$8.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 7.81% | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
$45.67 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 0% | -- |
|
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
|
$35.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.35 | 3.84% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | 1.561 | -- | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
-- | 1.566 | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
-- | 1.561 | -- | -- |
|
NML
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund
|
-- | 1.310 | -- | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | 2.109 | -- | -- |
|
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
|
-- | 1.148 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NML
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TYG or EMO?
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net margin of --. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's return on equity of -- beat ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- EMOClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TYG or EMO?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has higher upside potential than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund, analysts believe Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is more attractive than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure0 0 0 EMOClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund0 0 0 -
Is TYG or EMO More Risky?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 2.204, which suggesting that the stock is 120.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has a beta of 2.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.682%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TYG or EMO?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.62%. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund offers a yield of 7.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TYG or EMO?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net income of -- is lower than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is -- versus -- for ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- -- EMOClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TYG or KYN?
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net margin of --. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's return on equity of -- beat Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TYG or KYN?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,, analysts believe Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is more attractive than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure0 0 0 KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,0 0 0 -
Is TYG or KYN More Risky?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 2.204, which suggesting that the stock is 120.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has a beta of 1.731, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.074%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TYG or KYN?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.62%. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, offers a yield of 6.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TYG or KYN?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net income of -- is lower than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is -- versus -- for Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- -- KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TYG or NML?
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net margin of --. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's return on equity of -- beat Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- NMLNeuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TYG or NML?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund, analysts believe Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is more attractive than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure0 0 0 NMLNeuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is TYG or NML More Risky?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 2.204, which suggesting that the stock is 120.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund has a beta of 1.884, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.4%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TYG or NML?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.62%. Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund offers a yield of 7.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TYG or NML?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net income of -- is lower than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is -- versus -- for Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- -- NMLNeuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TYG or SRV?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net margin of --. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's return on equity of -- beat NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TYG or SRV?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has higher upside potential than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund, analysts believe Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is more attractive than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure0 0 0 SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 -
Is TYG or SRV More Risky?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 2.204, which suggesting that the stock is 120.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 1.528, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.817%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TYG or SRV?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.62%. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TYG or SRV?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net income of -- is lower than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is -- versus -- for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- -- SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TYG or TPYP?
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net margin of --. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's return on equity of -- beat Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- TPYPTortoise North American Pipeline Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TYG or TPYP?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund, analysts believe Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is more attractive than Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure0 0 0 TPYPTortoise North American Pipeline Fund0 0 0 -
Is TYG or TPYP More Risky?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 2.204, which suggesting that the stock is 120.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.641%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TYG or TPYP?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.62%. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TYG or TPYP?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net income of -- is lower than Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is -- versus -- for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- -- TPYPTortoise North American Pipeline Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…
Why Is Marvell Stock Up?
Semiconductor and data infrastructure company Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) absolutely trounced…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
39
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 11
IonQ [IONQ] is up 7.07% over the past day.
Buy
87
CEG alert for Jan 11
Constellation Energy [CEG] is up 25.15% over the past day.
Sell
2
CRNX alert for Jan 11
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals [CRNX] is down 16.31% over the past day.
