WGO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor has a net margin of -0.83% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of 3.78%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -1.38% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 13.45%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $62.25, signalling upside risk potential of 73.98%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.91 which suggests that it could grow by 7.31%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.591, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.114%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 7.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $625.6M, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Winnebago Industries's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 196.43x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 6.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.37x versus 0.22x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of -0.83% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of -6.21%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -1.38% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.57%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $62.25, signalling upside risk potential of 73.98%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $62.34 which suggests that it could grow by 25.21%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than General Motors.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.563%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $625.6M, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $47.7B. Winnebago Industries's net income of -$5.2M is higher than General Motors's net income of -$3B. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 196.43x while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.37x versus 0.30x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micromobility com has a net margin of -0.83% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of -196.95%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -1.38% beat Micromobility com's return on equity of --.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $62.25, signalling upside risk potential of 73.98%. On the other hand Micromobility com has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 974995025%. Given that Micromobility com has higher upside potential than Winnebago Industries, analysts believe Micromobility com is more attractive than Winnebago Industries.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micromobility com has a beta of 0.077, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.299%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Micromobility com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Micromobility com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $625.6M, which are larger than Micromobility com quarterly revenues of $775K. Winnebago Industries's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Micromobility com's net income of $5M. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 196.43x while Micromobility com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.37x versus 0.06x for Micromobility com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thor Industries has a net margin of -0.83% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of -0.03%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -1.38% beat Thor Industries's return on equity of 5.04%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $62.25, signalling upside risk potential of 73.98%. On the other hand Thor Industries has an analysts' consensus of $93.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.25%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Thor Industries, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Thor Industries.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Industries has a beta of 1.748, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.812%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Thor Industries offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries pays out 38.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $625.6M, which are smaller than Thor Industries quarterly revenues of $2B. Winnebago Industries's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Thor Industries's net income of -$551K. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 196.43x while Thor Industries's PE ratio is 21.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.37x versus 0.46x for Thor Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.