STM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

SEALSQ has a net margin of 10.27% compared to STMicroelectronics NV's net margin of --. STMicroelectronics NV's return on equity of 10.39% beat SEALSQ's return on equity of -72.18%.

STMicroelectronics NV has a consensus price target of $27.30, signalling upside risk potential of 44.5%. On the other hand SEALSQ has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 146.91%. Given that SEALSQ has higher upside potential than STMicroelectronics NV, analysts believe SEALSQ is more attractive than STMicroelectronics NV.

STMicroelectronics NV has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.589% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEALSQ has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

STMicroelectronics NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. SEALSQ offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. STMicroelectronics NV pays 18.5% of its earnings as a dividend. SEALSQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. STMicroelectronics NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

STMicroelectronics NV quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than SEALSQ quarterly revenues of --. STMicroelectronics NV's net income of $341M is higher than SEALSQ's net income of --. Notably, STMicroelectronics NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.64x while SEALSQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for STMicroelectronics NV is 1.32x versus 6.14x for SEALSQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Logitech International SA has a net margin of 10.27% compared to STMicroelectronics NV's net margin of 14.93%. STMicroelectronics NV's return on equity of 10.39% beat Logitech International SA's return on equity of 30.08%.

STMicroelectronics NV has a consensus price target of $27.30, signalling upside risk potential of 44.5%. On the other hand Logitech International SA has an analysts' consensus of $95.72 which suggests that it could grow by 40.24%. Given that STMicroelectronics NV has higher upside potential than Logitech International SA, analysts believe STMicroelectronics NV is more attractive than Logitech International SA.

STMicroelectronics NV has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.589% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Logitech International SA has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.717%.

STMicroelectronics NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Logitech International SA offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. STMicroelectronics NV pays 18.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Logitech International SA pays out 29.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

STMicroelectronics NV quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Logitech International SA quarterly revenues of $1.3B. STMicroelectronics NV's net income of $341M is higher than Logitech International SA's net income of $200.1M. Notably, STMicroelectronics NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.64x while Logitech International SA's PE ratio is 16.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for STMicroelectronics NV is 1.32x versus 2.31x for Logitech International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sportradar Group AG has a net margin of 10.27% compared to STMicroelectronics NV's net margin of -0.36%. STMicroelectronics NV's return on equity of 10.39% beat Sportradar Group AG's return on equity of 3.89%.

STMicroelectronics NV has a consensus price target of $27.30, signalling upside risk potential of 44.5%. On the other hand Sportradar Group AG has an analysts' consensus of $26.36 which suggests that it could grow by 25.64%. Given that STMicroelectronics NV has higher upside potential than Sportradar Group AG, analysts believe STMicroelectronics NV is more attractive than Sportradar Group AG.

STMicroelectronics NV has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.589% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportradar Group AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

STMicroelectronics NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Sportradar Group AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. STMicroelectronics NV pays 18.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Sportradar Group AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. STMicroelectronics NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

STMicroelectronics NV quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Sportradar Group AG quarterly revenues of $327.3M. STMicroelectronics NV's net income of $341M is higher than Sportradar Group AG's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, STMicroelectronics NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.64x while Sportradar Group AG's PE ratio is 181.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for STMicroelectronics NV is 1.32x versus 5.49x for Sportradar Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WISeKey International Holding has a net margin of 10.27% compared to STMicroelectronics NV's net margin of --. STMicroelectronics NV's return on equity of 10.39% beat WISeKey International Holding's return on equity of -88.78%.

STMicroelectronics NV has a consensus price target of $27.30, signalling upside risk potential of 44.5%. On the other hand WISeKey International Holding has an analysts' consensus of $6.93 which suggests that it could grow by 110.03%. Given that WISeKey International Holding has higher upside potential than STMicroelectronics NV, analysts believe WISeKey International Holding is more attractive than STMicroelectronics NV.

STMicroelectronics NV has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.589% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WISeKey International Holding has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.139%.

STMicroelectronics NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. WISeKey International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. STMicroelectronics NV pays 18.5% of its earnings as a dividend. WISeKey International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. STMicroelectronics NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

STMicroelectronics NV quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than WISeKey International Holding quarterly revenues of --. STMicroelectronics NV's net income of $341M is higher than WISeKey International Holding's net income of --. Notably, STMicroelectronics NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.64x while WISeKey International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for STMicroelectronics NV is 1.32x versus 1.78x for WISeKey International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.