PATH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NextNav has a net margin of 12.23% compared to UiPath's net margin of -1688.65%. UiPath's return on equity of -3.9% beat NextNav's return on equity of -160.74%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $12.44, signalling upside risk potential of 14.46%. On the other hand NextNav has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.85%. Given that NextNav has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe NextNav is more attractive than UiPath.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextNav has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextNav offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextNav pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $423.6M, which are larger than NextNav quarterly revenues of $1.9M. UiPath's net income of $51.8M is higher than NextNav's net income of -$32.3M. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NextNav's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 4.26x versus 276.19x for NextNav. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SentinelOne has a net margin of 12.23% compared to UiPath's net margin of -31.39%. UiPath's return on equity of -3.9% beat SentinelOne's return on equity of -17.69%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $12.44, signalling upside risk potential of 14.46%. On the other hand SentinelOne has an analysts' consensus of $24.70 which suggests that it could grow by 27.64%. Given that SentinelOne has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe SentinelOne is more attractive than UiPath.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SentinelOne has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SentinelOne offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SentinelOne pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $423.6M, which are larger than SentinelOne quarterly revenues of $225.5M. UiPath's net income of $51.8M is higher than SentinelOne's net income of -$70.8M. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SentinelOne's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 4.26x versus 7.42x for SentinelOne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoundHound AI has a net margin of 12.23% compared to UiPath's net margin of -748.63%. UiPath's return on equity of -3.9% beat SoundHound AI's return on equity of -197.85%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $12.44, signalling upside risk potential of 14.46%. On the other hand SoundHound AI has an analysts' consensus of $14.57 which suggests that it could grow by 64.09%. Given that SoundHound AI has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe SoundHound AI is more attractive than UiPath.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoundHound AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoundHound AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoundHound AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $423.6M, which are larger than SoundHound AI quarterly revenues of $34.5M. UiPath's net income of $51.8M is higher than SoundHound AI's net income of -$258.6M. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SoundHound AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 4.26x versus 35.50x for SoundHound AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 12.23% compared to UiPath's net margin of -1.23%. UiPath's return on equity of -3.9% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $12.44, signalling upside risk potential of 14.46%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 80.56%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than UiPath.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.803, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.295%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $423.6M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. UiPath's net income of $51.8M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 4.26x versus 0.25x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.