MTW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caterpillar has a net margin of 9.51% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 17.21%. Manitowoc's return on equity of 9.18% beat Caterpillar's return on equity of 57.91%.

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $12.12, signalling upside risk potential of 39.11%. On the other hand Caterpillar has an analysts' consensus of $386.82 which suggests that it could grow by 17.02%. Given that Manitowoc has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe Manitowoc is more attractive than Caterpillar.

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caterpillar has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.794%.

Manitowoc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Caterpillar offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share. Manitowoc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar pays out 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manitowoc quarterly revenues are $596M, which are smaller than Caterpillar quarterly revenues of $16.2B. Manitowoc's net income of $56.7M is lower than Caterpillar's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Manitowoc's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.62x while Caterpillar's PE ratio is 14.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manitowoc is 0.14x versus 2.49x for Caterpillar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 9.51% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 13.72%. Manitowoc's return on equity of 9.18% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 35.33%.

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $12.12, signalling upside risk potential of 39.11%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $230.78 which suggests that it could grow by 20.06%. Given that Manitowoc has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Manitowoc is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.912%.

Manitowoc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Manitowoc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manitowoc quarterly revenues are $596M, which are smaller than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Manitowoc's net income of $56.7M is lower than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $140.2M. Notably, Manitowoc's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.62x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 23.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manitowoc is 0.14x versus 2.74x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of 9.51% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 15.38%. Manitowoc's return on equity of 9.18% beat Nordson's return on equity of 15.96%.

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $12.12, signalling upside risk potential of 39.11%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $252.06 which suggests that it could grow by 25.44%. Given that Manitowoc has higher upside potential than Nordson, analysts believe Manitowoc is more attractive than Nordson.

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.982%.

Manitowoc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Manitowoc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manitowoc quarterly revenues are $596M, which are smaller than Nordson quarterly revenues of $615.4M. Manitowoc's net income of $56.7M is lower than Nordson's net income of $94.7M. Notably, Manitowoc's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.62x while Nordson's PE ratio is 25.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manitowoc is 0.14x versus 4.33x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Terex has a net margin of 9.51% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of -0.16%. Manitowoc's return on equity of 9.18% beat Terex's return on equity of 18.59%.

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $12.12, signalling upside risk potential of 39.11%. On the other hand Terex has an analysts' consensus of $49.91 which suggests that it could grow by 31.1%. Given that Manitowoc has higher upside potential than Terex, analysts believe Manitowoc is more attractive than Terex.

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Terex has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.292%.

Manitowoc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Terex offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Manitowoc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Terex pays out 13.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Terex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manitowoc quarterly revenues are $596M, which are smaller than Terex quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Manitowoc's net income of $56.7M is higher than Terex's net income of -$2M. Notably, Manitowoc's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.62x while Terex's PE ratio is 7.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manitowoc is 0.14x versus 0.50x for Terex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.