LECO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bonal International has a net margin of 13.72% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings's net margin of --. Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 35.33% beat Bonal International's return on equity of --.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a consensus price target of $230.11, signalling upside risk potential of 33.77%. On the other hand Bonal International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Bonal International, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Bonal International.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bonal International has a beta of 0.129, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.109%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Bonal International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Bonal International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Bonal International quarterly revenues of --. Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $140.2M is higher than Bonal International's net income of --. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.11x while Bonal International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings is 2.45x versus -- for Bonal International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyster Yale has a net margin of 13.72% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings's net margin of 0.97%. Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 35.33% beat Hyster Yale's return on equity of 30.13%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a consensus price target of $230.11, signalling upside risk potential of 33.77%. On the other hand Hyster Yale has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 96.11%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.316, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.55%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Hyster Yale offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyster Yale pays out 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Hyster Yale quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $140.2M is higher than Hyster Yale's net income of $10.3M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.11x while Hyster Yale's PE ratio is 4.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings is 2.45x versus 0.15x for Hyster Yale. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kennametal has a net margin of 13.72% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings's net margin of 3.72%. Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 35.33% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a consensus price target of $230.11, signalling upside risk potential of 33.77%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.74%. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Kennametal.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.554, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.414%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Kennametal offers a yield of 4.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $482.1M. Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $140.2M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $17.9M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.11x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 15.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings is 2.45x versus 0.75x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of 13.72% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings's net margin of 15.38%. Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 35.33% beat Nordson's return on equity of 15.96%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a consensus price target of $230.11, signalling upside risk potential of 33.77%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $252.06 which suggests that it could grow by 42.61%. Given that Nordson has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Nordson is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.982%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Nordson quarterly revenues of $615.4M. Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $140.2M is higher than Nordson's net income of $94.7M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.11x while Nordson's PE ratio is 22.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings is 2.45x versus 3.81x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.