MNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chord Energy has a net margin of 94.36% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of 14.48%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 31.54% beat Chord Energy's return on equity of 11.63%.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $24.70, signalling upside risk potential of 57.93%. On the other hand Chord Energy has an analysts' consensus of $154.63 which suggests that it could grow by 36.19%. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than Chord Energy, analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than Chord Energy.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chord Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.58%. Chord Energy offers a yield of 7.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Chord Energy pays out 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $234.9M, which are smaller than Chord Energy quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $221.7M is higher than Chord Energy's net income of $210.6M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.19x while Chord Energy's PE ratio is 7.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.58x versus 1.14x for Chord Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HighPeak Energy has a net margin of 94.36% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of 3.83%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 31.54% beat HighPeak Energy's return on equity of 6.03%.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $24.70, signalling upside risk potential of 57.93%. On the other hand HighPeak Energy has an analysts' consensus of $22.25 which suggests that it could grow by 71.55%. Given that HighPeak Energy has higher upside potential than Mach Natural Resources LP, analysts believe HighPeak Energy is more attractive than Mach Natural Resources LP.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HighPeak Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.58%. HighPeak Energy offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $234.9M, which are larger than HighPeak Energy quarterly revenues of $234.8M. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $221.7M is higher than HighPeak Energy's net income of $9M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.19x while HighPeak Energy's PE ratio is 19.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.58x versus 1.56x for HighPeak Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Era Helium has a net margin of 94.36% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of --. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 31.54% beat New Era Helium's return on equity of --.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $24.70, signalling upside risk potential of 57.93%. On the other hand New Era Helium has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than New Era Helium.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.58%. New Era Helium offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. New Era Helium pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $234.9M, which are larger than New Era Helium quarterly revenues of --. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $221.7M is higher than New Era Helium's net income of --. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.19x while New Era Helium's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.58x versus -- for New Era Helium. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prairie Operating has a net margin of 94.36% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of -150.36%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 31.54% beat Prairie Operating's return on equity of -89.94%.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $24.70, signalling upside risk potential of 57.93%. On the other hand Prairie Operating has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than Prairie Operating, analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than Prairie Operating.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.989, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.905%.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.58%. Prairie Operating offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Prairie Operating pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $234.9M, which are larger than Prairie Operating quarterly revenues of $7.9M. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $221.7M is higher than Prairie Operating's net income of -$11.9M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.19x while Prairie Operating's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.58x versus -- for Prairie Operating. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.