HPK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chord Energy has a net margin of 18.39% compared to HighPeak Energy's net margin of 15.53%. HighPeak Energy's return on equity of 11.71% beat Chord Energy's return on equity of 14.36%.

HighPeak Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 57.88%. On the other hand Chord Energy has an analysts' consensus of $181.94 which suggests that it could grow by 63.16%. Given that Chord Energy has higher upside potential than HighPeak Energy, analysts believe Chord Energy is more attractive than HighPeak Energy.

HighPeak Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chord Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HighPeak Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Chord Energy offers a yield of 9.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.44 per share. HighPeak Energy pays 6.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Chord Energy pays out 48.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HighPeak Energy quarterly revenues are $271.6M, which are smaller than Chord Energy quarterly revenues of $1.5B. HighPeak Energy's net income of $49.9M is lower than Chord Energy's net income of $225.3M. Notably, HighPeak Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.17x while Chord Energy's PE ratio is 5.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HighPeak Energy is 1.64x versus 1.16x for Chord Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prairie Operating has a net margin of 18.39% compared to HighPeak Energy's net margin of --. HighPeak Energy's return on equity of 11.71% beat Prairie Operating's return on equity of --.

HighPeak Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 57.88%. On the other hand Prairie Operating has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HighPeak Energy has higher upside potential than Prairie Operating, analysts believe HighPeak Energy is more attractive than Prairie Operating.

HighPeak Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.950, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.014%.

HighPeak Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Prairie Operating offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HighPeak Energy pays 6.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Prairie Operating pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HighPeak Energy quarterly revenues are $271.6M, which are larger than Prairie Operating quarterly revenues of --. HighPeak Energy's net income of $49.9M is higher than Prairie Operating's net income of -$11.4M. Notably, HighPeak Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.17x while Prairie Operating's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HighPeak Energy is 1.64x versus -- for Prairie Operating. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Energy has a net margin of 18.39% compared to HighPeak Energy's net margin of 46.88%. HighPeak Energy's return on equity of 11.71% beat Vital Energy's return on equity of 17.64%.

HighPeak Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 57.88%. On the other hand Vital Energy has an analysts' consensus of $39.58 which suggests that it could grow by 39.33%. Given that HighPeak Energy has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe HighPeak Energy is more attractive than Vital Energy.

HighPeak Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Energy has a beta of 3.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 219.055%.

HighPeak Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Vital Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HighPeak Energy pays 6.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HighPeak Energy quarterly revenues are $271.6M, which are smaller than Vital Energy quarterly revenues of $459.2M. HighPeak Energy's net income of $49.9M is lower than Vital Energy's net income of $215.3M. Notably, HighPeak Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.17x while Vital Energy's PE ratio is 1.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HighPeak Energy is 1.64x versus 0.54x for Vital Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.