MFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

F&G Annuities & Life has a net margin of 13.26% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of -0.44%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 11.33% beat F&G Annuities & Life's return on equity of 0.37%.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -18.28%. On the other hand F&G Annuities & Life has an analysts' consensus of $46.67 which suggests that it could grow by 10.8%. Given that F&G Annuities & Life has higher upside potential than Manulife Financial, analysts believe F&G Annuities & Life is more attractive than Manulife Financial.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.087% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F&G Annuities & Life has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Manulife Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. F&G Annuities & Life offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Manulife Financial pays 54.4% of its earnings as a dividend. F&G Annuities & Life pays out -174.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Manulife Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial quarterly revenues are $10.7B, which are larger than F&G Annuities & Life quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Manulife Financial's net income of $1.4B is higher than F&G Annuities & Life's net income of -$6M. Notably, Manulife Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.81x while F&G Annuities & Life's PE ratio is 16.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial is 1.54x versus 0.97x for F&G Annuities & Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National has a net margin of 13.26% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of -12.58%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 11.33% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 5.12%.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -18.28%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $36.09 which suggests that it could grow by 13.71%. Given that Lincoln National has higher upside potential than Manulife Financial, analysts believe Lincoln National is more attractive than Manulife Financial.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.087% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.774, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.395%.

Manulife Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 5.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Manulife Financial pays 54.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out -51.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Manulife Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial quarterly revenues are $10.7B, which are larger than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Manulife Financial's net income of $1.4B is higher than Lincoln National's net income of -$528M. Notably, Manulife Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.81x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 22.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial is 1.54x versus 0.40x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica has a net margin of 13.26% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of 21.23%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 11.33% beat Primerica's return on equity of 21.41%.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -18.28%. On the other hand Primerica has an analysts' consensus of $309.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.84%. Given that Primerica has higher upside potential than Manulife Financial, analysts believe Primerica is more attractive than Manulife Financial.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.087% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.951%.

Manulife Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Primerica offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Manulife Financial pays 54.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial quarterly revenues are $10.7B, which are larger than Primerica quarterly revenues of $774.1M. Manulife Financial's net income of $1.4B is higher than Primerica's net income of $164.4M. Notably, Manulife Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.81x while Primerica's PE ratio is 20.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial is 1.54x versus 3.04x for Primerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reinsurance Group of America has a net margin of 13.26% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of 2.78%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 11.33% beat Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.59%.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -18.28%. On the other hand Reinsurance Group of America has an analysts' consensus of $253.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.97%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Manulife Financial, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Manulife Financial.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.087% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.265%.

Manulife Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Reinsurance Group of America offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. Manulife Financial pays 54.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America pays out 24.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial quarterly revenues are $10.7B, which are larger than Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Manulife Financial's net income of $1.4B is higher than Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $156M. Notably, Manulife Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.81x while Reinsurance Group of America's PE ratio is 19.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial is 1.54x versus 0.65x for Reinsurance Group of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.