FG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management has a net margin of 22.25% compared to F&G Annuities & Life's net margin of -18.21%. F&G Annuities & Life's return on equity of 16.71% beat Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.9%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.57%. On the other hand Abacus Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 81.61%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than F&G Annuities & Life, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than F&G Annuities & Life.

F&G Annuities & Life has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Abacus Global Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F&G Annuities & Life pays 18.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. F&G Annuities & Life's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F&G Annuities & Life quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues of $28.1M. F&G Annuities & Life's net income of $327M is higher than Abacus Global Management's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, F&G Annuities & Life's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while Abacus Global Management's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F&G Annuities & Life is 0.83x versus 5.07x for Abacus Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 22.25% compared to F&G Annuities & Life's net margin of 62.3%. F&G Annuities & Life's return on equity of 16.71% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.57%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $64.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.96%. Given that F&G Annuities & Life has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe F&G Annuities & Life is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

F&G Annuities & Life has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.235%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F&G Annuities & Life pays 18.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F&G Annuities & Life quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $1.1B. F&G Annuities & Life's net income of $327M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M. Notably, F&G Annuities & Life's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F&G Annuities & Life is 0.83x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of 22.25% compared to F&G Annuities & Life's net margin of 5.71%. F&G Annuities & Life's return on equity of 16.71% beat Citizens's return on equity of 7.63%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.57%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.53%. Given that F&G Annuities & Life has higher upside potential than Citizens, analysts believe F&G Annuities & Life is more attractive than Citizens.

F&G Annuities & Life has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.112, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.82%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F&G Annuities & Life pays 18.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. F&G Annuities & Life's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F&G Annuities & Life quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $63.5M. F&G Annuities & Life's net income of $327M is higher than Citizens's net income of $3.6M. Notably, F&G Annuities & Life's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while Citizens's PE ratio is 17.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F&G Annuities & Life is 0.83x versus 1.07x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fidelity National Financial has a net margin of 22.25% compared to F&G Annuities & Life's net margin of 12.75%. F&G Annuities & Life's return on equity of 16.71% beat Fidelity National Financial's return on equity of 15.6%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.57%. On the other hand Fidelity National Financial has an analysts' consensus of $70.80 which suggests that it could grow by 11.44%. Given that F&G Annuities & Life has higher upside potential than Fidelity National Financial, analysts believe F&G Annuities & Life is more attractive than Fidelity National Financial.

F&G Annuities & Life has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity National Financial has a beta of 1.318, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.757%.

F&G Annuities & Life has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Fidelity National Financial offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. F&G Annuities & Life pays 18.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Financial pays out 41.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F&G Annuities & Life quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Fidelity National Financial quarterly revenues of $3.5B. F&G Annuities & Life's net income of $327M is lower than Fidelity National Financial's net income of $450M. Notably, F&G Annuities & Life's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while Fidelity National Financial's PE ratio is 13.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F&G Annuities & Life is 0.83x versus 1.30x for Fidelity National Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.