CIA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Citizens's net margin of -18.21%. Citizens's return on equity of 7.63% beat Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.9%.

Citizens has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.91%. On the other hand Abacus Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 84.51%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Citizens, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Citizens.

Citizens has a beta of 0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 88.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Citizens has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abacus Global Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citizens pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citizens quarterly revenues are $63.5M, which are larger than Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues of $28.1M. Citizens's net income of $3.6M is higher than Abacus Global Management's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Citizens's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.76x while Abacus Global Management's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens is 1.07x versus 4.99x for Abacus Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Citizens's net margin of 62.3%. Citizens's return on equity of 7.63% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05%.

Citizens has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.91%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $64.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.42%. Given that Brighthouse Financial has higher upside potential than Citizens, analysts believe Brighthouse Financial is more attractive than Citizens.

Citizens has a beta of 0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 88.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.235%.

Citizens has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citizens pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Citizens quarterly revenues are $63.5M, which are smaller than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Citizens's net income of $3.6M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M. Notably, Citizens's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.76x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens is 1.07x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Citizens's net margin of -0.06%. Citizens's return on equity of 7.63% beat Genworth Financial's return on equity of 3.3%.

Citizens has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.91%. On the other hand Genworth Financial has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.22%. Given that Genworth Financial has higher upside potential than Citizens, analysts believe Genworth Financial is more attractive than Citizens.

Citizens has a beta of 0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 88.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.844%.

Citizens has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genworth Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citizens pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citizens quarterly revenues are $63.5M, which are smaller than Genworth Financial quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Citizens's net income of $3.6M is higher than Genworth Financial's net income of -$1M. Notably, Citizens's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.76x while Genworth Financial's PE ratio is 10.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens is 1.07x versus 0.44x for Genworth Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Citizens's net margin of 33.18%. Citizens's return on equity of 7.63% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29%.

Citizens has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.91%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $39.18 which suggests that it could grow by 4.91%. Given that Lincoln National has higher upside potential than Citizens, analysts believe Lincoln National is more attractive than Citizens.

Citizens has a beta of 0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 88.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.426%.

Citizens has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 4.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Citizens pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Citizens quarterly revenues are $63.5M, which are smaller than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Citizens's net income of $3.6M is lower than Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Citizens's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.76x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 2.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens is 1.07x versus 0.36x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.