GNW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management has a net margin of -0.06% compared to Genworth Financial's net margin of -18.21%. Genworth Financial's return on equity of 3.3% beat Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.9%.

Genworth Financial has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.22%. On the other hand Abacus Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 84.51%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Genworth Financial.

Genworth Financial has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.844% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Genworth Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abacus Global Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genworth Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genworth Financial quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues of $28.1M. Genworth Financial's net income of -$1M is higher than Abacus Global Management's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Genworth Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.73x while Abacus Global Management's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial is 0.44x versus 4.99x for Abacus Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of -0.06% compared to Genworth Financial's net margin of 62.3%. Genworth Financial's return on equity of 3.3% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05%.

Genworth Financial has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.22%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $64.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.42%. Given that Genworth Financial has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Genworth Financial is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Genworth Financial has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.844% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.235%.

Genworth Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genworth Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Genworth Financial quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Genworth Financial's net income of -$1M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M. Notably, Genworth Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.73x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial is 0.44x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of -0.06% compared to Genworth Financial's net margin of 5.71%. Genworth Financial's return on equity of 3.3% beat Citizens's return on equity of 7.63%.

Genworth Financial has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.22%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.91%. Given that Genworth Financial has higher upside potential than Citizens, analysts believe Genworth Financial is more attractive than Citizens.

Genworth Financial has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.844% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.112, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.82%.

Genworth Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genworth Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genworth Financial quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $63.5M. Genworth Financial's net income of -$1M is lower than Citizens's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Genworth Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.73x while Citizens's PE ratio is 17.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial is 0.44x versus 1.07x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National has a net margin of -0.06% compared to Genworth Financial's net margin of 33.18%. Genworth Financial's return on equity of 3.3% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29%.

Genworth Financial has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.22%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $39.18 which suggests that it could grow by 4.91%. Given that Genworth Financial has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Genworth Financial is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Genworth Financial has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.844% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.426%.

Genworth Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 4.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Genworth Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Genworth Financial quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Genworth Financial's net income of -$1M is lower than Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Genworth Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.73x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 2.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial is 0.44x versus 0.36x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.