KFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a net margin of -5.37% compared to Kingsway Financial Services's net margin of -2965.78%. Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -46.15% beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -47.69%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -50.98%. On the other hand Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2937.98%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.038, which suggesting that the stock is 96.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsway Financial Services pays -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues are $30.2M, which are larger than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues of -$1.4M. Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$1.6M is higher than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Kingsway Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's PE ratio is 4.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsway Financial Services is 1.97x versus 5.11x for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of -5.37% compared to Kingsway Financial Services's net margin of 1.71%. Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -46.15% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 17.46%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -50.98%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $462.40 which suggests that it could grow by 15.99%. Given that Group 1 Automotive has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Group 1 Automotive is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.038, which suggesting that the stock is 96.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.09%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Kingsway Financial Services pays -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues are $30.2M, which are smaller than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $94.8M. Notably, Kingsway Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 10.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsway Financial Services is 1.97x versus 0.27x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Openlane has a net margin of -5.37% compared to Kingsway Financial Services's net margin of 10.63%. Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -46.15% beat Openlane's return on equity of 8.26%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -50.98%. On the other hand Openlane has an analysts' consensus of $23.43 which suggests that it could grow by 26.23%. Given that Openlane has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Openlane is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.038, which suggesting that the stock is 96.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openlane has a beta of 1.382, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.244%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openlane offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsway Financial Services pays -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane pays out 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues are $30.2M, which are smaller than Openlane quarterly revenues of $492M. Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Openlane's net income of $52.3M. Notably, Kingsway Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Openlane's PE ratio is 40.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsway Financial Services is 1.97x versus 1.13x for Openlane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of -5.37% compared to Kingsway Financial Services's net margin of 1.5%. Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -46.15% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.11%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -50.98%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $83.88 which suggests that it could grow by 27.48%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.038, which suggesting that the stock is 96.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.583, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.344%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsway Financial Services pays -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues are $30.2M, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6B. Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$1.6M is lower than CarMax's net income of $89.9M. Notably, Kingsway Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CarMax's PE ratio is 20.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsway Financial Services is 1.97x versus 0.39x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.