KEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Matson has a net margin of 10.83% compared to Kirby's net margin of 20.7%. Kirby's return on equity of 9.47% beat Matson's return on equity of 16.95%.

Kirby has a consensus price target of $137.17, signalling upside risk potential of 32.02%. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of $150.50 which suggests that it could grow by 10.18%. Given that Kirby has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Kirby is more attractive than Matson.

Kirby has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.595%.

Kirby has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matson offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Kirby pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 15.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kirby quarterly revenues are $831.1M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $962M. Kirby's net income of $90M is lower than Matson's net income of $199.1M. Notably, Kirby's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.94x while Matson's PE ratio is 11.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirby is 1.87x versus 1.42x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of 10.83% compared to Kirby's net margin of 3.34%. Kirby's return on equity of 9.47% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74%.

Kirby has a consensus price target of $137.17, signalling upside risk potential of 32.02%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $9.82 which suggests that it could grow by 80.79%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Kirby.

Kirby has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.528%.

Kirby has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 7.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Kirby pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kirby quarterly revenues are $831.1M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $153.1M. Kirby's net income of $90M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Kirby's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.94x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 11.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirby is 1.87x versus 0.48x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a net margin of 10.83% compared to Kirby's net margin of -23.72%. Kirby's return on equity of 9.47% beat Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -13.18%.

Kirby has a consensus price target of $137.17, signalling upside risk potential of 32.02%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 93.17%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Kirby.

Kirby has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.736%.

Kirby has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seacor Marine Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kirby pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kirby quarterly revenues are $831.1M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues of $68.9M. Kirby's net income of $90M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$16.3M. Notably, Kirby's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.94x while Seacor Marine Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirby is 1.87x versus 0.67x for Seacor Marine Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Airlines Holdings has a net margin of 10.83% compared to Kirby's net margin of 6.5%. Kirby's return on equity of 9.47% beat United Airlines Holdings's return on equity of 28.01%.

Kirby has a consensus price target of $137.17, signalling upside risk potential of 32.02%. On the other hand United Airlines Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $119.48 which suggests that it could grow by 11.55%. Given that Kirby has higher upside potential than United Airlines Holdings, analysts believe Kirby is more attractive than United Airlines Holdings.

Kirby has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Airlines Holdings has a beta of 1.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.643%.

Kirby has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Airlines Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kirby pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Airlines Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kirby quarterly revenues are $831.1M, which are smaller than United Airlines Holdings quarterly revenues of $14.8B. Kirby's net income of $90M is lower than United Airlines Holdings's net income of $965M. Notably, Kirby's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.94x while United Airlines Holdings's PE ratio is 12.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirby is 1.87x versus 0.63x for United Airlines Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.