HUBB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kimball Electronics has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Hubbell's net margin of 0.96%. Hubbell's return on equity of 25.24% beat Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 1.49%.

Hubbell has a consensus price target of $448.94, signalling upside risk potential of 32.36%. On the other hand Kimball Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $21.25 which suggests that it could grow by 24.71%. Given that Hubbell has higher upside potential than Kimball Electronics, analysts believe Hubbell is more attractive than Kimball Electronics.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.945, which suggesting that the stock is 5.523% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.828%.

Hubbell has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Kimball Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hubbell pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimball Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues of $357.4M. Hubbell's net income of $197M is higher than Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Hubbell's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.62x while Kimball Electronics's PE ratio is 53.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell is 3.26x versus 0.27x for Kimball Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Hubbell's net margin of --. Hubbell's return on equity of 25.24% beat Orbit International's return on equity of --.

Hubbell has a consensus price target of $448.94, signalling upside risk potential of 32.36%. On the other hand Orbit International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.42%. Given that Hubbell has higher upside potential than Orbit International, analysts believe Hubbell is more attractive than Orbit International.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.945, which suggesting that the stock is 5.523% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International has a beta of 0.511, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.863%.

Hubbell has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Orbit International offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hubbell pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Orbit International quarterly revenues of --. Hubbell's net income of $197M is higher than Orbit International's net income of --. Notably, Hubbell's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.62x while Orbit International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell is 3.26x versus 0.75x for Orbit International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Powell Industries has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Hubbell's net margin of 14.4%. Hubbell's return on equity of 25.24% beat Powell Industries's return on equity of 36.88%.

Hubbell has a consensus price target of $448.94, signalling upside risk potential of 32.36%. On the other hand Powell Industries has an analysts' consensus of $249.07 which suggests that it could grow by 37.22%. Given that Powell Industries has higher upside potential than Hubbell, analysts believe Powell Industries is more attractive than Hubbell.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.945, which suggesting that the stock is 5.523% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Powell Industries has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.47%.

Hubbell has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Powell Industries offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Hubbell pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Powell Industries pays out 8.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Powell Industries quarterly revenues of $241.4M. Hubbell's net income of $197M is higher than Powell Industries's net income of $34.8M. Notably, Hubbell's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.62x while Powell Industries's PE ratio is 13.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell is 3.26x versus 2.09x for Powell Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Industries has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Hubbell's net margin of -1.28%. Hubbell's return on equity of 25.24% beat RF Industries's return on equity of -15.6%.

Hubbell has a consensus price target of $448.94, signalling upside risk potential of 32.36%. On the other hand RF Industries has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 36.99%. Given that RF Industries has higher upside potential than Hubbell, analysts believe RF Industries is more attractive than Hubbell.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.945, which suggesting that the stock is 5.523% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Industries has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.316%.

Hubbell has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. RF Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hubbell pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. RF Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than RF Industries quarterly revenues of $19.2M. Hubbell's net income of $197M is higher than RF Industries's net income of -$245K. Notably, Hubbell's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.62x while RF Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell is 3.26x versus 0.65x for RF Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.