HLLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -26.98% compared to Holley's net margin of -23.71%. Holley's return on equity of -5.21% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -16.73%.

Holley has a consensus price target of $4.57, signalling upside risk potential of 77.88%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 290.63%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Holley, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Holley.

Holley has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.1%.

Holley has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Holley pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Holley quarterly revenues are $140.1M, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $163.3M. Holley's net income of -$37.8M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$38.7M. Notably, Holley's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.92x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holley is 0.51x versus 0.05x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorman Products has a net margin of -26.98% compared to Holley's net margin of 10.21%. Holley's return on equity of -5.21% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 15.65%.

Holley has a consensus price target of $4.57, signalling upside risk potential of 77.88%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of $144.75 which suggests that it could grow by 16.03%. Given that Holley has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe Holley is more attractive than Dorman Products.

Holley has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.871, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.852%.

Holley has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Holley pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Holley quarterly revenues are $140.1M, which are smaller than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $533.8M. Holley's net income of -$37.8M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $54.5M. Notably, Holley's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.92x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 20.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holley is 0.51x versus 1.92x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -26.98% compared to Holley's net margin of --. Holley's return on equity of -5.21% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Holley has a consensus price target of $4.57, signalling upside risk potential of 77.88%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 40.85%. Given that Holley has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Holley is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Holley has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.799%.

Holley has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Holley pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Holley quarterly revenues are $140.1M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Holley's net income of -$37.8M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Holley's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.92x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holley is 0.51x versus 128.36x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of -26.98% compared to Holley's net margin of 1.5%. Holley's return on equity of -5.21% beat Monro's return on equity of 3.03%.

Holley has a consensus price target of $4.57, signalling upside risk potential of 77.88%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.21%. Given that Holley has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe Holley is more attractive than Monro.

Holley has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.082%.

Holley has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro offers a yield of 7.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Holley pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out 94.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Holley quarterly revenues are $140.1M, which are smaller than Monro quarterly revenues of $305.8M. Holley's net income of -$37.8M is lower than Monro's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Holley's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.92x while Monro's PE ratio is 23.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holley is 0.51x versus 0.39x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.