CVGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 5.54% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group's net margin of --. Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of 20.22% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 244.29%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.74%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.391, which suggesting that the stock is 139.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.489%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues are $171.8M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of $9.5M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.11x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group is 0.07x versus 273.78x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of 5.54% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group's net margin of 1.87%. Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of 20.22% beat Monro's return on equity of 4.12%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 244.29%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $29.75 which suggests that it could grow by 18.1%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Monro.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.391, which suggesting that the stock is 139.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 1.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.677%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out 94.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues are $171.8M, which are smaller than Monro quarterly revenues of $301.4M. Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of $9.5M is higher than Monro's net income of $5.6M. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.11x while Monro's PE ratio is 28.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group is 0.07x versus 0.65x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America has a net margin of 5.54% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group's net margin of -1.42%. Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of 20.22% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -23.51%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 244.29%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 78.12%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Motorcar Parts of America, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Motorcar Parts of America.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.391, which suggesting that the stock is 139.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.728%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Motorcar Parts of America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues are $171.8M, which are smaller than Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues of $208.2M. Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of $9.5M is higher than Motorcar Parts of America's net income of -$3M. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.11x while Motorcar Parts of America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group is 0.07x versus 0.21x for Motorcar Parts of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sypris Solutions has a net margin of 5.54% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group's net margin of 1.09%. Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of 20.22% beat Sypris Solutions's return on equity of -14.2%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 244.29%. On the other hand Sypris Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -39.9%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Sypris Solutions, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Sypris Solutions.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.391, which suggesting that the stock is 139.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sypris Solutions has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.336%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sypris Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sypris Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues are $171.8M, which are larger than Sypris Solutions quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of $9.5M is higher than Sypris Solutions's net income of $390K. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.11x while Sypris Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group is 0.07x versus 0.33x for Sypris Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.