HAYW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

W.W. Grainger has a net margin of 16.73% compared to Hayward Holdings's net margin of 11.22%. Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.74% beat W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 52.75%.

Hayward Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.56, signalling upside risk potential of 18.39%. On the other hand W.W. Grainger has an analysts' consensus of $1,052.10 which suggests that it could grow by 8.12%. Given that Hayward Holdings has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe Hayward Holdings is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.178, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.817%.

Hayward Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W.W. Grainger offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share. Hayward Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger pays out 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues are $327.1M, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Hayward Holdings's net income of $54.7M is lower than W.W. Grainger's net income of $475M. Notably, Hayward Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.40x while W.W. Grainger's PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings is 2.95x versus 2.78x for W.W. Grainger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco has a net margin of 16.73% compared to Hayward Holdings's net margin of 9.96%. Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.74% beat Masco's return on equity of 755.52%.

Hayward Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.56, signalling upside risk potential of 18.39%. On the other hand Masco has an analysts' consensus of $84.66 which suggests that it could grow by 21.64%. Given that Masco has higher upside potential than Hayward Holdings, analysts believe Masco is more attractive than Hayward Holdings.

Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.962%.

Hayward Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Hayward Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco pays out 30.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues are $327.1M, which are smaller than Masco quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Hayward Holdings's net income of $54.7M is lower than Masco's net income of $182M. Notably, Hayward Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.40x while Masco's PE ratio is 18.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings is 2.95x versus 1.94x for Masco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology has a net margin of 16.73% compared to Hayward Holdings's net margin of --. Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.74% beat Solidion Technology's return on equity of --.

Hayward Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.56, signalling upside risk potential of 18.39%. On the other hand Solidion Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hayward Holdings has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe Hayward Holdings is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hayward Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solidion Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hayward Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues are $327.1M, which are larger than Solidion Technology quarterly revenues of --. Hayward Holdings's net income of $54.7M is higher than Solidion Technology's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Hayward Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.40x while Solidion Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings is 2.95x versus -- for Solidion Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of 16.73% compared to Hayward Holdings's net margin of 3.01%. Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.74% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.43%.

Hayward Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.56, signalling upside risk potential of 18.39%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $223.95 which suggests that it could grow by 37.71%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than Hayward Holdings, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than Hayward Holdings.

Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 2.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.456%.

Hayward Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WESCO International offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Hayward Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 19.36% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues are $327.1M, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Hayward Holdings's net income of $54.7M is lower than WESCO International's net income of $165.4M. Notably, Hayward Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.40x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 12.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings is 2.95x versus 0.38x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.