GOLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Escalade has a net margin of -0.25% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of 4.22%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 24.06% beat Escalade's return on equity of 7.78%.

Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of $70.86, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Escalade has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 39.32%. Given that Escalade has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Escalade is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.459% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Escalade has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.83%.

Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Escalade offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 25.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Escalade pays out 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $445.2M, which are larger than Escalade quarterly revenues of $63.9M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of -$1.1M is lower than Escalade's net income of $2.7M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while Escalade's PE ratio is 15.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.46x versus 0.80x for Escalade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Johnson Outdoors has a net margin of -0.25% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of -14.2%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 24.06% beat Johnson Outdoors's return on equity of -9.51%.

Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of $70.86, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Johnson Outdoors has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 122.62%. Given that Johnson Outdoors has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Johnson Outdoors is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.459% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Outdoors has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.708%.

Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Johnson Outdoors offers a yield of 5.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 25.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors pays out -50.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $445.2M, which are larger than Johnson Outdoors quarterly revenues of $107.6M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of -$1.1M is higher than Johnson Outdoors's net income of -$15.3M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while Johnson Outdoors's PE ratio is 89.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.46x versus 0.41x for Johnson Outdoors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peloton Interactive has a net margin of -0.25% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of -13.65%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 24.06% beat Peloton Interactive's return on equity of --.

Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of $70.86, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Peloton Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $9.61 which suggests that it could grow by 92.18%. Given that Peloton Interactive has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Peloton Interactive is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.459% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peloton Interactive has a beta of 2.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.488%.

Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Peloton Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 25.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Peloton Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $445.2M, which are smaller than Peloton Interactive quarterly revenues of $674M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of -$1.1M is higher than Peloton Interactive's net income of -$92M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while Peloton Interactive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.46x versus 0.72x for Peloton Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Connexa Sports Technologies has a net margin of -0.25% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of -12.57%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 24.06% beat Connexa Sports Technologies's return on equity of -194.52%.

Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of $70.86, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Connexa Sports Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Acushnet Holdings has higher upside potential than Connexa Sports Technologies, analysts believe Acushnet Holdings is more attractive than Connexa Sports Technologies.

Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.459% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Connexa Sports Technologies has a beta of 0.062, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.784%.

Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Connexa Sports Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 25.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Connexa Sports Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $445.2M, which are larger than Connexa Sports Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of -$1.1M is lower than Connexa Sports Technologies's net income of -$411.2K. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while Connexa Sports Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.46x versus 0.30x for Connexa Sports Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.