GLP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Central Energy Partners LP has a net margin of 1.04% compared to Global Partners LP's net margin of --. Global Partners LP's return on equity of 18.46% beat Central Energy Partners LP's return on equity of --.

Global Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.78%. On the other hand Central Energy Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Partners LP has higher upside potential than Central Energy Partners LP, analysts believe Global Partners LP is more attractive than Central Energy Partners LP.

Global Partners LP has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Central Energy Partners LP has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.97%. Central Energy Partners LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Partners LP pays 94.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Energy Partners LP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Partners LP quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Central Energy Partners LP quarterly revenues of --. Global Partners LP's net income of $45.9M is higher than Central Energy Partners LP's net income of --. Notably, Global Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Central Energy Partners LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Partners LP is 0.09x versus -- for Central Energy Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 1.04% compared to Global Partners LP's net margin of -72.12%. Global Partners LP's return on equity of 18.46% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -18.89%.

Global Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.78%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.81 which suggests that it could grow by 43.78%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Global Partners LP, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Global Partners LP.

Global Partners LP has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 2.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.951%.

Global Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.97%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 4.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Global Partners LP pays 94.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Partners LP quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Global Partners LP's net income of $45.9M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$978.8M. Notably, Global Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Partners LP is 0.09x versus 0.52x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunoco LP has a net margin of 1.04% compared to Global Partners LP's net margin of -0.61%. Global Partners LP's return on equity of 18.46% beat Sunoco LP's return on equity of 20.66%.

Global Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.78%. On the other hand Sunoco LP has an analysts' consensus of $62.88 which suggests that it could grow by 22.14%. Given that Sunoco LP has higher upside potential than Global Partners LP, analysts believe Sunoco LP is more attractive than Global Partners LP.

Global Partners LP has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunoco LP has a beta of 1.340, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.006%.

Global Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.97%. Sunoco LP offers a yield of 6.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Global Partners LP pays 94.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunoco LP pays out 119.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sunoco LP's is not.

Global Partners LP quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Sunoco LP quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Global Partners LP's net income of $45.9M is higher than Sunoco LP's net income of -$35M. Notably, Global Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while Sunoco LP's PE ratio is 11.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Partners LP is 0.09x versus 0.24x for Sunoco LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

World Kinect has a net margin of 1.04% compared to Global Partners LP's net margin of 0.32%. Global Partners LP's return on equity of 18.46% beat World Kinect's return on equity of 6.74%.

Global Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.78%. On the other hand World Kinect has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.93%. Given that World Kinect has higher upside potential than Global Partners LP, analysts believe World Kinect is more attractive than Global Partners LP.

Global Partners LP has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.635% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison World Kinect has a beta of 1.278, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.844%.

Global Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.97%. World Kinect offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Global Partners LP pays 94.9% of its earnings as a dividend. World Kinect pays out 64.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Partners LP quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than World Kinect quarterly revenues of $10.5B. Global Partners LP's net income of $45.9M is higher than World Kinect's net income of $33.5M. Notably, Global Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.47x while World Kinect's PE ratio is 11.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Partners LP is 0.09x versus 0.04x for World Kinect. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.