PTEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hess has a net margin of -4.44% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 16.97%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -22.8% beat Hess's return on equity of 25.2%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 95.97%. On the other hand Hess has an analysts' consensus of $167.57 which suggests that it could grow by 31.42%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Hess, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Hess.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hess has a beta of 0.877, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.287%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.86%. Hess offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess pays out 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Hess quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$51.6M is lower than Hess's net income of $542M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Hess's PE ratio is 14.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.40x versus 3.05x for Hess. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of -4.44% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 8.09%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -22.8% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 10.63%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 95.97%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne has an analysts' consensus of $33.20 which suggests that it could grow by 74.92%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.45500000000001%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.86%. Helmerich & Payne offers a yield of 7.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues of $677.3M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$51.6M is lower than Helmerich & Payne's net income of $54.8M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Helmerich & Payne's PE ratio is 6.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.40x versus 0.68x for Helmerich & Payne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noble Corp PLC has a net margin of -4.44% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 10.42%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -22.8% beat Noble Corp PLC's return on equity of 10.6%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 95.97%. On the other hand Noble Corp PLC has an analysts' consensus of $35.91 which suggests that it could grow by 94.74%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Noble Corp PLC, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Noble Corp PLC.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noble Corp PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.86%. Noble Corp PLC offers a yield of 10.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC pays out 61.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Noble Corp PLC quarterly revenues of $927.3M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$51.6M is lower than Noble Corp PLC's net income of $96.6M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Noble Corp PLC's PE ratio is 6.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.40x versus 0.91x for Noble Corp PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sable Offshore has a net margin of -4.44% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of --. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -22.8% beat Sable Offshore's return on equity of --.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 95.97%. On the other hand Sable Offshore has an analysts' consensus of $28.50 which suggests that it could grow by 71.58%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Sable Offshore, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Sable Offshore.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sable Offshore has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.86%. Sable Offshore offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Sable Offshore pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Sable Offshore quarterly revenues of --. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$51.6M is higher than Sable Offshore's net income of -$255.6M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Sable Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.40x versus -- for Sable Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.