GFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Griffon's net margin of 4.46%. Griffon's return on equity of 83.9% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 17.08%.

Griffon has a consensus price target of $82.95, signalling upside risk potential of 37.51%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -8.19%. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than DXP Enterprises, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than DXP Enterprises.

Griffon has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.705, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.494%.

Griffon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Griffon pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Griffon quarterly revenues are $659.7M, which are larger than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $472.9M. Griffon's net income of $62.5M is higher than DXP Enterprises's net income of $21.1M. Notably, Griffon's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.36x while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 21.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Griffon is 1.39x versus 0.79x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EVI Industries has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Griffon's net margin of 3.45%. Griffon's return on equity of 83.9% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.65%.

Griffon has a consensus price target of $82.95, signalling upside risk potential of 37.51%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than EVI Industries.

Griffon has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of 0.346, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.448%.

Griffon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Griffon pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Griffon quarterly revenues are $659.7M, which are larger than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $93.6M. Griffon's net income of $62.5M is higher than EVI Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Griffon's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.36x while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 35.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Griffon is 1.39x versus 0.63x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Falcons Beyond Global has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Griffon's net margin of 68.63%. Griffon's return on equity of 83.9% beat Falcons Beyond Global's return on equity of --.

Griffon has a consensus price target of $82.95, signalling upside risk potential of 37.51%. On the other hand Falcons Beyond Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than Falcons Beyond Global, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than Falcons Beyond Global.

Griffon has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Falcons Beyond Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Griffon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. Falcons Beyond Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Griffon pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Falcons Beyond Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Griffon quarterly revenues are $659.7M, which are larger than Falcons Beyond Global quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Griffon's net income of $62.5M is higher than Falcons Beyond Global's net income of $5.9M. Notably, Griffon's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.36x while Falcons Beyond Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Griffon is 1.39x versus 13.08x for Falcons Beyond Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hayward Holdings has a net margin of 9.47% compared to Griffon's net margin of 7.25%. Griffon's return on equity of 83.9% beat Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 7.15%.

Griffon has a consensus price target of $82.95, signalling upside risk potential of 37.51%. On the other hand Hayward Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.25%. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than Hayward Holdings, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than Hayward Holdings.

Griffon has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Griffon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. Hayward Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Griffon pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Hayward Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Griffon quarterly revenues are $659.7M, which are larger than Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues of $227.6M. Griffon's net income of $62.5M is higher than Hayward Holdings's net income of $16.5M. Notably, Griffon's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.36x while Hayward Holdings's PE ratio is 36.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Griffon is 1.39x versus 3.41x for Hayward Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.