FN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Credo Technology Group Holding has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Fabrinet's net margin of -5.87%. Fabrinet's return on equity of 18.42% beat Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of -4.68%.

Fabrinet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.32%. On the other hand Credo Technology Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of $74.31 which suggests that it could grow by 1.76%. Given that Fabrinet has higher upside potential than Credo Technology Group Holding, analysts believe Fabrinet is more attractive than Credo Technology Group Holding.

Fabrinet has a beta of 0.928, which suggesting that the stock is 7.247% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fabrinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Credo Technology Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fabrinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Credo Technology Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fabrinet quarterly revenues are $804.2M, which are larger than Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues of $72M. Fabrinet's net income of $77.4M is higher than Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Fabrinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.64x while Credo Technology Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabrinet is 2.84x versus 49.28x for Credo Technology Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

M-Tron Industries has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Fabrinet's net margin of --. Fabrinet's return on equity of 18.42% beat M-Tron Industries's return on equity of --.

Fabrinet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.32%. On the other hand M-Tron Industries has an analysts' consensus of $63.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.09%. Given that M-Tron Industries has higher upside potential than Fabrinet, analysts believe M-Tron Industries is more attractive than Fabrinet.

Fabrinet has a beta of 0.928, which suggesting that the stock is 7.247% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison M-Tron Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fabrinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. M-Tron Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fabrinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. M-Tron Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fabrinet quarterly revenues are $804.2M, which are larger than M-Tron Industries quarterly revenues of --. Fabrinet's net income of $77.4M is higher than M-Tron Industries's net income of --. Notably, Fabrinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.64x while M-Tron Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabrinet is 2.84x versus 9.98x for M-Tron Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Fabrinet's net margin of 55.04%. Fabrinet's return on equity of 18.42% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

Fabrinet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.32%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.99 which suggests that it could grow by 23.47%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Fabrinet, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Fabrinet.

Fabrinet has a beta of 0.928, which suggesting that the stock is 7.247% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.285%.

Fabrinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Fabrinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fabrinet quarterly revenues are $804.2M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Fabrinet's net income of $77.4M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Fabrinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.64x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabrinet is 2.84x versus 30.75x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vuzix has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Fabrinet's net margin of -665.53%. Fabrinet's return on equity of 18.42% beat Vuzix's return on equity of -122.88%.

Fabrinet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.32%. On the other hand Vuzix has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -52.66%. Given that Fabrinet has higher upside potential than Vuzix, analysts believe Fabrinet is more attractive than Vuzix.

Fabrinet has a beta of 0.928, which suggesting that the stock is 7.247% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vuzix has a beta of 1.620, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.951%.

Fabrinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vuzix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fabrinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vuzix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fabrinet quarterly revenues are $804.2M, which are larger than Vuzix quarterly revenues of $1.4M. Fabrinet's net income of $77.4M is higher than Vuzix's net income of -$9.2M. Notably, Fabrinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.64x while Vuzix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabrinet is 2.84x versus 49.94x for Vuzix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.