EQNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Matador Resources has a net margin of 7.52% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 23.86%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.23% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 18.13%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $27.59, signalling upside risk potential of 21.75%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $65.17 which suggests that it could grow by 58.67%. Given that Matador Resources has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe Matador Resources is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.49% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 2.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 174.1%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.18%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $26.5B, which are larger than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $1B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2B is higher than Matador Resources's net income of $240.1M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.29x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 5.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.63x versus 1.39x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shell PLC has a net margin of 7.52% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 1.4%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.23% beat Shell PLC's return on equity of 8.62%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $27.59, signalling upside risk potential of 21.75%. On the other hand Shell PLC has an analysts' consensus of $75.57 which suggests that it could grow by 14.75%. Given that Equinor ASA has higher upside potential than Shell PLC, analysts believe Equinor ASA is more attractive than Shell PLC.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.49% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shell PLC has a beta of 0.273, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.737%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.18%. Shell PLC offers a yield of 4.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Shell PLC pays out 53.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $26.5B, which are smaller than Shell PLC quarterly revenues of $66.3B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2B is higher than Shell PLC's net income of $928M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.29x while Shell PLC's PE ratio is 13.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.63x versus 0.74x for Shell PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 7.52% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 22.53%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.23% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $27.59, signalling upside risk potential of 21.75%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $39.67 which suggests that it could grow by 68.94%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.49% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 3.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 276.328%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.18%. SM Energy offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $26.5B, which are larger than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $835.9M. Equinor ASA's net income of $2B is higher than SM Energy's net income of $188.3M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.29x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 3.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.63x versus 1.02x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TotalEnergies SE has a net margin of 7.52% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 8.4%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.23% beat TotalEnergies SE's return on equity of 13.14%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $27.59, signalling upside risk potential of 21.75%. On the other hand TotalEnergies SE has an analysts' consensus of $68.66 which suggests that it could grow by 14.52%. Given that Equinor ASA has higher upside potential than TotalEnergies SE, analysts believe Equinor ASA is more attractive than TotalEnergies SE.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.49% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TotalEnergies SE has a beta of 0.437, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.262%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.18%. TotalEnergies SE offers a yield of 5.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. TotalEnergies SE pays out 48.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $26.5B, which are smaller than TotalEnergies SE quarterly revenues of $47.1B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2B is lower than TotalEnergies SE's net income of $4B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.29x while TotalEnergies SE's PE ratio is 9.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.63x versus 0.72x for TotalEnergies SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.