CRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EOG Resources has a net margin of 3.57% compared to California Resources's net margin of 22.14%. California Resources's return on equity of 14.03% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 22.11%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $62.54, signalling upside risk potential of 82.75%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $139.88 which suggests that it could grow by 28.29%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than EOG Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.198%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $924M, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.7B. California Resources's net income of $33M is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.3B. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.33x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 9.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 0.94x versus 2.65x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Murphy Oil has a net margin of 3.57% compared to California Resources's net margin of 7.52%. California Resources's return on equity of 14.03% beat Murphy Oil's return on equity of 7.46%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $62.54, signalling upside risk potential of 82.75%. On the other hand Murphy Oil has an analysts' consensus of $33.76 which suggests that it could grow by 57.34%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than Murphy Oil, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than Murphy Oil.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Murphy Oil has a beta of 1.686, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.635%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. Murphy Oil offers a yield of 5.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Murphy Oil pays out 44.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $924M, which are larger than Murphy Oil quarterly revenues of $669.6M. California Resources's net income of $33M is lower than Murphy Oil's net income of $50.3M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.33x while Murphy Oil's PE ratio is 7.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 0.94x versus 1.07x for Murphy Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Resources has a net margin of 3.57% compared to California Resources's net margin of 14.22%. California Resources's return on equity of 14.03% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 6.92%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $62.54, signalling upside risk potential of 82.75%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $41.14 which suggests that it could grow by 22.66%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than Range Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.162%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $924M, which are larger than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $667M. California Resources's net income of $33M is lower than Range Resources's net income of $94.8M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.33x while Range Resources's PE ratio is 30.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 0.94x versus 3.46x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talos Energy has a net margin of 3.57% compared to California Resources's net margin of -13.3%. California Resources's return on equity of 14.03% beat Talos Energy's return on equity of -2.89%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $62.54, signalling upside risk potential of 82.75%. On the other hand Talos Energy has an analysts' consensus of $14.55 which suggests that it could grow by 110.8%. Given that Talos Energy has higher upside potential than California Resources, analysts believe Talos Energy is more attractive than California Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talos Energy has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.945%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. Talos Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Talos Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $924M, which are larger than Talos Energy quarterly revenues of $485.2M. California Resources's net income of $33M is higher than Talos Energy's net income of -$64.5M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.33x while Talos Energy's PE ratio is 16.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 0.94x versus 0.61x for Talos Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.