COHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Know Labs has a net margin of 7.21% compared to Coherent's net margin of --. Coherent's return on equity of 0.89% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $114.57, signalling upside risk potential of 74.31%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1167.43%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than Coherent, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than Coherent.

Coherent has a beta of 1.696, which suggesting that the stock is 69.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Coherent's net income of $103.4M is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 1.92x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of 7.21% compared to Coherent's net margin of 11.08%. Coherent's return on equity of 0.89% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $114.57, signalling upside risk potential of 74.31%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.52%. Given that Coherent has higher upside potential than LGL Group, analysts believe Coherent is more attractive than LGL Group.

Coherent has a beta of 1.696, which suggesting that the stock is 69.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.447, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.324%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Coherent's net income of $103.4M is higher than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LGL Group's PE ratio is 125.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 1.92x versus 18.36x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of 7.21% compared to Coherent's net margin of -15.14%. Coherent's return on equity of 0.89% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -50.46%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $114.57, signalling upside risk potential of 74.31%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $99.69 which suggests that it could grow by 59.3%. Given that Coherent has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Coherent is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Coherent has a beta of 1.696, which suggesting that the stock is 69.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.394%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $402.2M. Coherent's net income of $103.4M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$60.9M. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 1.92x versus 3.02x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 7.21% compared to Coherent's net margin of 56.17%. Coherent's return on equity of 0.89% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $114.57, signalling upside risk potential of 74.31%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $171.01 which suggests that it could grow by 55.93%. Given that Coherent has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Coherent is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Coherent has a beta of 1.696, which suggesting that the stock is 69.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.633%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Coherent's net income of $103.4M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 37.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 1.92x versus 20.85x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.