CLH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Pacific Green Technologies has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Clean Harbors's net margin of --. Clean Harbors's return on equity of 17.78% beat Pacific Green Technologies's return on equity of --.

Clean Harbors has a consensus price target of $215.71, signalling upside risk potential of 20.26%. On the other hand Pacific Green Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clean Harbors has higher upside potential than Pacific Green Technologies, analysts believe Clean Harbors is more attractive than Pacific Green Technologies.

Clean Harbors has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.508% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Green Technologies has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.928%.

Clean Harbors has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacific Green Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Harbors pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Green Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Harbors quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Pacific Green Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Clean Harbors's net income of $115.2M is higher than Pacific Green Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Clean Harbors's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.96x while Pacific Green Technologies's PE ratio is 3.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Harbors is 2.15x versus 0.22x for Pacific Green Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plastic2Oil has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Clean Harbors's net margin of --. Clean Harbors's return on equity of 17.78% beat Plastic2Oil's return on equity of --.

Clean Harbors has a consensus price target of $215.71, signalling upside risk potential of 20.26%. On the other hand Plastic2Oil has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clean Harbors has higher upside potential than Plastic2Oil, analysts believe Clean Harbors is more attractive than Plastic2Oil.

Clean Harbors has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.508% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plastic2Oil has a beta of -0.177, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.709%.

Clean Harbors has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plastic2Oil offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Harbors pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plastic2Oil pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Harbors quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Plastic2Oil quarterly revenues of --. Clean Harbors's net income of $115.2M is higher than Plastic2Oil's net income of --. Notably, Clean Harbors's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.96x while Plastic2Oil's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Harbors is 2.15x versus -- for Plastic2Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quest Resource Holding has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Clean Harbors's net margin of -4.65%. Clean Harbors's return on equity of 17.78% beat Quest Resource Holding's return on equity of -12%.

Clean Harbors has a consensus price target of $215.71, signalling upside risk potential of 20.26%. On the other hand Quest Resource Holding has an analysts' consensus of $11.17 which suggests that it could grow by 84.88%. Given that Quest Resource Holding has higher upside potential than Clean Harbors, analysts believe Quest Resource Holding is more attractive than Clean Harbors.

Clean Harbors has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.508% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Resource Holding has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.237%.

Clean Harbors has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quest Resource Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Harbors pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Resource Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Harbors quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Quest Resource Holding quarterly revenues of $72.8M. Clean Harbors's net income of $115.2M is higher than Quest Resource Holding's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Clean Harbors's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.96x while Quest Resource Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Harbors is 2.15x versus 0.43x for Quest Resource Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waste Management has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Clean Harbors's net margin of 13.55%. Clean Harbors's return on equity of 17.78% beat Waste Management's return on equity of 36.31%.

Clean Harbors has a consensus price target of $215.71, signalling upside risk potential of 20.26%. On the other hand Waste Management has an analysts' consensus of $231.85 which suggests that it could grow by 12.23%. Given that Clean Harbors has higher upside potential than Waste Management, analysts believe Clean Harbors is more attractive than Waste Management.

Clean Harbors has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.508% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waste Management has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.869%.

Clean Harbors has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waste Management offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Clean Harbors pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management pays out 49.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clean Harbors quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Waste Management quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Clean Harbors's net income of $115.2M is lower than Waste Management's net income of $760M. Notably, Clean Harbors's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.96x while Waste Management's PE ratio is 31.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Harbors is 2.15x versus 3.90x for Waste Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.