CWST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a net margin of 1.4% compared to Casella Waste Systems's net margin of -53.41%. Casella Waste Systems's return on equity of 0.61% beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.49%.

Casella Waste Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.47%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 102.21%. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than Casella Waste Systems, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than Casella Waste Systems.

Casella Waste Systems has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.12%.

Casella Waste Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casella Waste Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Casella Waste Systems quarterly revenues are $411.6M, which are larger than Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues of $16.8M. Casella Waste Systems's net income of $5.8M is higher than Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$9M. Notably, Casella Waste Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 883.08x while Perma-Fix Environmental Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casella Waste Systems is 4.15x versus 2.34x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectaire Holdings has a net margin of 1.4% compared to Casella Waste Systems's net margin of --. Casella Waste Systems's return on equity of 0.61% beat Spectaire Holdings's return on equity of --.

Casella Waste Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.47%. On the other hand Spectaire Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10488.24%. Given that Spectaire Holdings has higher upside potential than Casella Waste Systems, analysts believe Spectaire Holdings is more attractive than Casella Waste Systems.

Casella Waste Systems has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectaire Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Casella Waste Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectaire Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casella Waste Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectaire Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Casella Waste Systems quarterly revenues are $411.6M, which are larger than Spectaire Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Casella Waste Systems's net income of $5.8M is higher than Spectaire Holdings's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Casella Waste Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 883.08x while Spectaire Holdings's PE ratio is 0.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casella Waste Systems is 4.15x versus -- for Spectaire Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan Environmental Solutions has a net margin of 1.4% compared to Casella Waste Systems's net margin of -349.06%. Casella Waste Systems's return on equity of 0.61% beat Titan Environmental Solutions's return on equity of -443.56%.

Casella Waste Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.47%. On the other hand Titan Environmental Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Casella Waste Systems has higher upside potential than Titan Environmental Solutions, analysts believe Casella Waste Systems is more attractive than Titan Environmental Solutions.

Casella Waste Systems has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Casella Waste Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Titan Environmental Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casella Waste Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Titan Environmental Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Casella Waste Systems quarterly revenues are $411.6M, which are larger than Titan Environmental Solutions quarterly revenues of $3.9M. Casella Waste Systems's net income of $5.8M is higher than Titan Environmental Solutions's net income of -$13.6M. Notably, Casella Waste Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 883.08x while Titan Environmental Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casella Waste Systems is 4.15x versus 3.29x for Titan Environmental Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a net margin of 1.4% compared to Casella Waste Systems's net margin of 10.61%. Casella Waste Systems's return on equity of 0.61% beat Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's return on equity of 8.6%.

Casella Waste Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.47%. On the other hand Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $35.29 which suggests that it could grow by 5.2%. Given that Casella Waste Systems has higher upside potential than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions, analysts believe Casella Waste Systems is more attractive than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions.

Casella Waste Systems has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.793%.

Casella Waste Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Casella Waste Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions pays out 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casella Waste Systems quarterly revenues are $411.6M, which are larger than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions quarterly revenues of $410M. Casella Waste Systems's net income of $5.8M is lower than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net income of $43.5M. Notably, Casella Waste Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 883.08x while Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's PE ratio is 47.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casella Waste Systems is 4.15x versus 4.23x for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.