BOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 11.4% compared to Bowhead Specialty Holdings's net margin of 44.89%. Bowhead Specialty Holdings's return on equity of 13.02% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.79%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling downside risk potential of -9.27%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bowhead Specialty Holdings has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Bowhead Specialty Holdings is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.925%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Bowhead Specialty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings quarterly revenues are $119.3M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $338.7M. Bowhead Specialty Holdings's net income of $13.6M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $152M. Notably, Bowhead Specialty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.38x while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 35.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bowhead Specialty Holdings is 3.04x versus 5.73x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 11.4% compared to Bowhead Specialty Holdings's net margin of 6.77%. Bowhead Specialty Holdings's return on equity of 13.02% beat Root's return on equity of 17.79%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling downside risk potential of -9.27%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $96.60 which suggests that it could fall by -24.88%. Given that Root has more downside risk than Bowhead Specialty Holdings, analysts believe Bowhead Specialty Holdings is more attractive than Root.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bowhead Specialty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings quarterly revenues are $119.3M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $326.7M. Bowhead Specialty Holdings's net income of $13.6M is lower than Root's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Bowhead Specialty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.38x while Root's PE ratio is 75.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bowhead Specialty Holdings is 3.04x versus 1.74x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of 11.4% compared to Bowhead Specialty Holdings's net margin of 4.73%. Bowhead Specialty Holdings's return on equity of 13.02% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.2%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling downside risk potential of -9.27%. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $57.38 which suggests that it could grow by 6.27%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Bowhead Specialty Holdings, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Bowhead Specialty Holdings.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bowhead Specialty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings quarterly revenues are $119.3M, which are smaller than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $304.5M. Bowhead Specialty Holdings's net income of $13.6M is lower than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $14.4M. Notably, Bowhead Specialty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.38x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 18.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bowhead Specialty Holdings is 3.04x versus 1.94x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 11.4% compared to Bowhead Specialty Holdings's net margin of 0.49%. Bowhead Specialty Holdings's return on equity of 13.02% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -3.1%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling downside risk potential of -9.27%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.60 which suggests that it could grow by 42.2%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Bowhead Specialty Holdings, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Bowhead Specialty Holdings.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.665, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.468%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bowhead Specialty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings quarterly revenues are $119.3M, which are smaller than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $337.3M. Bowhead Specialty Holdings's net income of $13.6M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Bowhead Specialty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.38x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bowhead Specialty Holdings is 3.04x versus 1.22x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.