AVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Idacorp has a net margin of 12.61% compared to Avista's net margin of 9.51%. Avista's return on equity of 7.11% beat Idacorp's return on equity of 9.24%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $40.60, signalling downside risk potential of -4.31%. On the other hand Idacorp has an analysts' consensus of $126.13 which suggests that it could grow by 5.92%. Given that Idacorp has higher upside potential than Avista, analysts believe Idacorp is more attractive than Avista.

Avista has a beta of 0.383, which suggesting that the stock is 61.698% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Idacorp has a beta of 0.564, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.557%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.51%. Idacorp offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Idacorp pays out 61.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $532.8M, which are larger than Idacorp quarterly revenues of $398.1M. Avista's net income of $67.2M is higher than Idacorp's net income of $37.9M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.61x while Idacorp's PE ratio is 21.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.73x versus 3.43x for Idacorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSource has a net margin of 12.61% compared to Avista's net margin of 14.1%. Avista's return on equity of 7.11% beat NiSource's return on equity of 7.49%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $40.60, signalling downside risk potential of -4.31%. On the other hand NiSource has an analysts' consensus of $41.46 which suggests that it could grow by 2.03%. Given that NiSource has higher upside potential than Avista, analysts believe NiSource is more attractive than Avista.

Avista has a beta of 0.383, which suggesting that the stock is 61.698% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSource has a beta of 0.483, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.669%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.51%. NiSource offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSource pays out 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $532.8M, which are smaller than NiSource quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Avista's net income of $67.2M is lower than NiSource's net income of $223.9M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.61x while NiSource's PE ratio is 24.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.73x versus 3.40x for NiSource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OGE Energy has a net margin of 12.61% compared to Avista's net margin of 13.4%. Avista's return on equity of 7.11% beat OGE Energy's return on equity of 9.73%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $40.60, signalling downside risk potential of -4.31%. On the other hand OGE Energy has an analysts' consensus of $43.30 which suggests that it could fall by -6.64%. Given that OGE Energy has more downside risk than Avista, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than OGE Energy.

Avista has a beta of 0.383, which suggesting that the stock is 61.698% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OGE Energy has a beta of 0.575, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.512%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.51%. OGE Energy offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. OGE Energy pays out 76.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $532.8M, which are smaller than OGE Energy quarterly revenues of $760.5M. Avista's net income of $67.2M is lower than OGE Energy's net income of $101.9M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.61x while OGE Energy's PE ratio is 21.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.73x versus 3.13x for OGE Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verde Clean Fuels has a net margin of 12.61% compared to Avista's net margin of --. Avista's return on equity of 7.11% beat Verde Clean Fuels's return on equity of --.

Avista has a consensus price target of $40.60, signalling downside risk potential of -4.31%. On the other hand Verde Clean Fuels has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than Verde Clean Fuels, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than Verde Clean Fuels.

Avista has a beta of 0.383, which suggesting that the stock is 61.698% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verde Clean Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.51%. Verde Clean Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Verde Clean Fuels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Avista's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $532.8M, which are larger than Verde Clean Fuels quarterly revenues of --. Avista's net income of $67.2M is higher than Verde Clean Fuels's net income of -$777.7K. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.61x while Verde Clean Fuels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.73x versus -- for Verde Clean Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.