ATI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kennametal has a net margin of 11.69% compared to ATI's net margin of 3.72%. ATI's return on equity of 22.46% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4%.

ATI has a consensus price target of $74.44, signalling upside risk potential of 42.23%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.99%. Given that ATI has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe ATI is more attractive than Kennametal.

ATI has a beta of 1.142, which suggesting that the stock is 14.156% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.694, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.41%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $482.1M. ATI's net income of $137.1M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $17.9M. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.53x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 17.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 1.76x versus 0.85x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 11.69% compared to ATI's net margin of -0.33%. ATI's return on equity of 22.46% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.43%.

ATI has a consensus price target of $74.44, signalling upside risk potential of 42.23%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $44.33 which suggests that it could grow by 21.16%. Given that ATI has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe ATI is more attractive than Proto Labs.

ATI has a beta of 1.142, which suggesting that the stock is 14.156% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.658%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $121.8M. ATI's net income of $137.1M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of -$404K. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.53x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 56.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 1.76x versus 1.84x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International has a net margin of 11.69% compared to ATI's net margin of --. ATI's return on equity of 22.46% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.

ATI has a consensus price target of $74.44, signalling upside risk potential of 42.23%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4900%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than ATI, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than ATI.

ATI has a beta of 1.142, which suggesting that the stock is 14.156% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.658, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.164%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. ATI's net income of $137.1M is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.53x while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 1.76x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker has a net margin of 11.69% compared to ATI's net margin of 5.24%. ATI's return on equity of 22.46% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33%.

ATI has a consensus price target of $74.44, signalling upside risk potential of 42.23%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker has an analysts' consensus of $101.34 which suggests that it could grow by 23.34%. Given that ATI has higher upside potential than Stanley Black & Decker, analysts believe ATI is more attractive than Stanley Black & Decker.

ATI has a beta of 1.142, which suggesting that the stock is 14.156% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.257, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.721%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stanley Black & Decker offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues of $3.7B. ATI's net income of $137.1M is lower than Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.53x while Stanley Black & Decker's PE ratio is 42.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 1.76x versus 0.81x for Stanley Black & Decker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.