Financhill
Sell
37

ACA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$99.26
Seasonality move :
5.13%
Day range:
$96.83 - $101.98
52-week range:
$72.75 - $113.43
Dividend yield:
0.2%
P/E ratio:
37.78x
P/S ratio:
1.95x
P/B ratio:
1.99x
Volume:
570.5K
Avg. volume:
262.4K
1-year change:
22.67%
Market cap:
$4.8B
Revenue:
$2.3B
EPS (TTM):
$2.63

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ACA
Arcosa
$685M $0.85 18.6% 39.29% $105.80
FLR
Fluor
$4.7B $0.76 15.97% -33.94% $57.75
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$184.6M $0.18 16.22% -29.17% $14.67
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$235M $0.07 35.5% -- --
RELT
Reliant Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$608M $1.68 9.9% 3.13% --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ACA
Arcosa
$99.35 $105.80 $4.8B 37.78x $0.05 0.2% 1.95x
FLR
Fluor
$50.34 $57.75 $8.6B 34.96x $0.00 0% 0.55x
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$11.72 $14.67 $788.4M 13.47x $0.00 0% 1.07x
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$7.68 -- $298.8M -- $0.00 0% 0.33x
RELT
Reliant Holdings
$0.08 -- $1.3M 21.13x $0.00 0% 0.48x
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$175.15 -- $5.4B 29.59x $0.00 0% 2.60x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ACA
Arcosa
33.69% 2.221 26.76% 2.67x
FLR
Fluor
33.15% 0.481 13.5% 1.72x
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
49.23% 3.641 58.24% 0.82x
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
16.42% 4.387 12.46% 1.31x
RELT
Reliant Holdings
22.79% 7.858 3.88% 1.53x
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
31.05% 4.182 7.22% 1.27x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ACA
Arcosa
$136.7M $54.3M 4.15% 5.41% 5.45% $100.6M
FLR
Fluor
$88M $51M 7.78% 12.15% 2.37% $279M
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$36.2M $16.7M 7.39% 14.75% 8.84% -$11.5M
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$27.1M $6.2M -7.69% -10.35% 3.51% $33.3M
RELT
Reliant Holdings
$229.8K -$113.7K 20.07% 44.89% -11.93% $379K
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$129.8M $87.6M 18.6% 28.17% 16.01% $138.3M

Arcosa vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or FLR?

    Fluor has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 1.32%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Fluor's return on equity of 12.15%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    21.35% $0.34 $3.7B
    FLR
    Fluor
    2.15% $0.31 $3.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or FLR?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $105.80, signalling upside risk potential of 16.76%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $57.75 which suggests that it could grow by 14.72%. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Fluor.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    FLR
    Fluor
    6 4 0
  • Is ACA or FLR More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.547% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.890, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.961%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or FLR?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out 20.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or FLR?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is lower than Fluor's net income of $54M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.78x while Fluor's PE ratio is 34.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.95x versus 0.55x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.95x 37.78x $640.4M $16.6M
    FLR
    Fluor
    0.55x 34.96x $4.1B $54M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or GLDD?

    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 4.63%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    21.35% $0.34 $3.7B
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    18.95% $0.13 $837.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or GLDD?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $105.80, signalling upside risk potential of 16.76%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 25.14%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Arcosa.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    1 0 0
  • Is ACA or GLDD More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.547% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.343%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or GLDD?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or GLDD?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $191.2M. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.78x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 13.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.95x versus 1.07x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.95x 37.78x $640.4M $16.6M
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    1.07x 13.47x $191.2M $8.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or ORN?

    Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 1.88%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -10.35%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    21.35% $0.34 $3.7B
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    11.94% $0.12 $170.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or ORN?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $105.80, signalling upside risk potential of 16.76%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47.57%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Arcosa.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is ACA or ORN More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.547% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.577%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or ORN?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or ORN?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $226.7M. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.78x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.95x versus 0.33x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.95x 37.78x $640.4M $16.6M
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    0.33x -- $226.7M $4.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or RELT?

    Reliant Holdings has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of -11.74%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Reliant Holdings's return on equity of 44.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    21.35% $0.34 $3.7B
    RELT
    Reliant Holdings
    24.16% -$0.01 $247.4K
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or RELT?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $105.80, signalling upside risk potential of 16.76%. On the other hand Reliant Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Reliant Holdings, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Reliant Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    RELT
    Reliant Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is ACA or RELT More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.547% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliant Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or RELT?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Reliant Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliant Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or RELT?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are larger than Reliant Holdings quarterly revenues of $951.2K. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is higher than Reliant Holdings's net income of -$111.7K. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.78x while Reliant Holdings's PE ratio is 21.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.95x versus 0.48x for Reliant Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.95x 37.78x $640.4M $16.6M
    RELT
    Reliant Holdings
    0.48x 21.13x $951.2K -$111.7K
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or STRL?

    Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 10.33%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 28.17%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    21.35% $0.34 $3.7B
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    21.86% $1.97 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or STRL?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $105.80, signalling upside risk potential of 16.76%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.34%. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    0 0 0
  • Is ACA or STRL More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.547% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.169%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or STRL?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or STRL?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $593.7M. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $61.3M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.78x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 29.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.95x versus 2.60x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.95x 37.78x $640.4M $16.6M
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    2.60x 29.59x $593.7M $61.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21

Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21

Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock