Financhill
Sell
30

ACA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$78.09
Seasonality move :
2.75%
Day range:
$76.29 - $78.89
52-week range:
$68.11 - $113.43
Dividend yield:
0.26%
P/E ratio:
40.82x
P/S ratio:
1.48x
P/B ratio:
1.57x
Volume:
292.5K
Avg. volume:
382.6K
1-year change:
-3.25%
Market cap:
$3.8B
Revenue:
$2.6B
EPS (TTM):
$1.91

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ACA
Arcosa
$614.5M $0.18 3.12% -75.29% $111.83
FLR
Fluor
$4.2B $0.49 9.3% -39.01% $48.90
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$206.7M $0.26 4.05% -15.32% $14.50
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$173.4M -$0.07 10.48% -68.42% $10.50
SLND
Southland Holdings
$228.6M -$0.37 -20.64% -3575% $4.50
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$409.1M $1.45 -7.92% 28.29% $198.33
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ACA
Arcosa
$77.96 $111.83 $3.8B 40.82x $0.05 0.26% 1.48x
FLR
Fluor
$33.28 $48.90 $5.6B 2.71x $0.00 0% 0.35x
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$8.88 $14.50 $597.5M 10.57x $0.00 0% 0.79x
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$5.75 $10.50 $224.2M -- $0.00 0% 0.25x
SLND
Southland Holdings
$3.20 $4.50 $172.8M -- $0.00 0% 0.16x
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$137.09 $198.33 $4.2B 16.56x $0.00 0% 2.02x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ACA
Arcosa
41.02% 2.316 35.79% 1.04x
FLR
Fluor
21.85% 1.380 13.16% 1.63x
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
49.96% 2.743 59.01% 0.94x
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
13.33% 4.639 8.11% 1.35x
SLND
Southland Holdings
64.71% 1.956 160.47% 1.36x
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
28.13% 2.634 6.1% 1.35x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ACA
Arcosa
$128.9M $39.9M 2.79% 3.91% 6.88% $194.9M
FLR
Fluor
$208M $152M 58.5% 84.64% 5.47% $296M
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$48.9M $27M 6.89% 13.72% 14.67% -$36.1M
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$30.3M $8.7M -0.99% -1.28% 4.52% $9.9M
SLND
Southland Holdings
$7.7M -$8M -20.27% -49.21% -2.64% -$11.5M
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$106.7M $62.5M 24.95% 36.63% 32.35% $158.6M

Arcosa vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or FLR?

    Fluor has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 43.73%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Fluor's return on equity of 84.64%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    19.35% -$0.16 $4.1B
    FLR
    Fluor
    4.88% $10.67 $5.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or FLR?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 43.45%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $48.90 which suggests that it could grow by 46.94%. Given that Fluor has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Fluor is more attractive than Arcosa.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    FLR
    Fluor
    6 3 0
  • Is ACA or FLR More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.656, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.56%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or FLR?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or FLR?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Fluor's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.82x while Fluor's PE ratio is 2.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.48x versus 0.35x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.48x 40.82x $666.2M -$7.7M
    FLR
    Fluor
    0.35x 2.71x $4.3B $1.9B
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or GLDD?

    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 9.72%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 13.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    19.35% -$0.16 $4.1B
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    24.13% $0.29 $897.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or GLDD?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 43.45%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 63.29%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Arcosa.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    2 0 0
  • Is ACA or GLDD More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.174, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.432%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or GLDD?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or GLDD?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $202.8M. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.82x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.48x versus 0.79x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.48x 40.82x $666.2M -$7.7M
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    0.79x 10.57x $202.8M $19.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or ORN?

    Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 3.11%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -1.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    19.35% -$0.16 $4.1B
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    13.96% $0.17 $173.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or ORN?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 43.45%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 82.61%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Arcosa.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    3 0 0
  • Is ACA or ORN More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.961%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or ORN?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or ORN?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $216.9M. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.82x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.48x versus 0.25x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.48x 40.82x $666.2M -$7.7M
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    0.25x -- $216.9M $6.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or SLND?

    Southland Holdings has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of -1.56%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -49.21%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    19.35% -$0.16 $4.1B
    SLND
    Southland Holdings
    2.87% -$0.09 $475.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or SLND?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 43.45%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 40.63%. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Southland Holdings, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Southland Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    SLND
    Southland Holdings
    2 1 0
  • Is ACA or SLND More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or SLND?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or SLND?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are larger than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $267.3M. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.82x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.48x versus 0.16x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.48x 40.82x $666.2M -$7.7M
    SLND
    Southland Holdings
    0.16x -- $267.3M -$4.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or STRL?

    Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 22.7%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    19.35% -$0.16 $4.1B
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    21.39% $3.64 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or STRL?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 43.45%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $198.33 which suggests that it could grow by 44.67%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Arcosa.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    3 0 0
  • Is ACA or STRL More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.836%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or STRL?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or STRL?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $498.8M. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.82x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 16.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.48x versus 2.02x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.48x 40.82x $666.2M -$7.7M
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    2.02x 16.56x $498.8M $113.2M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Energy Transfer a Good Dividend Stock to Buy Now?
Is Energy Transfer a Good Dividend Stock to Buy Now?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) offers an impressive yield, to say the…

Did the Market Bottom Already?
Did the Market Bottom Already?

The past few weeks have been among the most volatile…

Will NVIDIA Return to Its 52-Week High?
Will NVIDIA Return to Its 52-Week High?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been among the best-performing investments of the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 14

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is down 11.8% over the past day.

Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 14

Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 4.69% over the past day.

Sell
38
ZLAB alert for Apr 14

Zai Lab [ZLAB] is up 6.77% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock